Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35452941›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2022

Management of unusual rectal foreign body - Case report and literature review.

Ana Elisa de Landa Moraes Teixeira Grossi, Juan Eduardo Rios Rodriguez, Alexia Aina de Freitas Sousa, Danielle Alcântara Barbosa Machado, Victor Vinícius Monteiro Lins de Albuquerque, Frank Pinheiro Pessoa Coelho de Macedo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ana Elisa de Landa Moraes Teixeira GrossiNilton Lins Hospital Complex, Manaus, Brazil. Electronic address: anaelisadelanda@gmail.com.
Juan Eduardo Rios RodriguezGetúlio Vargas University Hospital (HUGV), Manaus, Brazil.
Alexia Aina de Freitas SousaFederal University of Amazonas (UFAM), Manaus, Brazil.
Danielle Alcântara Barbosa MachadoDepartment of General Surgery, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital (HUGV), Manaus, Brazil. Electronic address: danielle.barbosa@ebserh.gov.br.
Victor Vinícius Monteiro Lins de AlbuquerqueDepartment of General Surgery, Getúlio Vargas University Hospital (HUGV), Manaus, Brazil.
Frank Pinheiro Pessoa Coelho de MacedoDigestive System Surgery service at Getúlio Vargas University Hospital (HUGV), Manaus, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRetained rectal objects represent a rare complaint in the emergency room, affecting mainly males between 20 and 40 years, with most objects of a sexual nature, but the examiner must be aware of objects of an unusual nature. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 54-year-old male patient arrives at the surgical emergency department, with a report of an accident with the insertion of an object via the rectum, a gym dumbbell. Initially opted for transrectal object removal, but with difficulties due to its position. DISCUSSION: Retained rectal objects are a rare complaint in the emergency department, but with an increasingly important occurrence in recent years. Physical examination should include an assessment of the abdomen and digital rectal examination. Imaging tests are mandatory for diagnosis, with abdominal and pelvis radiography being the most requested. Although there is no consensus on the most appropriate removal technique, less invasive initial approaches are recommended, with transanal removal with a 60-75% success rate under local anesthesia. The follow-up after the procedure depends on several factors, and in general, the patient should be kept under observation and attention should be paid to significant changes in the evolution and alterations in the imaging tests.

conclusionThe clinical history in these cases can be confusing, due to the patient's fear of reporting the complaints. Radiography is the best initial test, and CT is reserved for cases of suspected complications. Whenever possible, perform the extraction rectally.

Indexed as

Case reportsForeign bodiesForeign objectGeneral surgeryRectum

Identifiers

PMID35452941
PMCPMC9048151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.