Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35452655›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

Increase in preterm stillbirths in association with reduction in iatrogenic preterm births during COVID-19 lockdown in Australia: a multicenter cohort study.

Lisa Hui, Melvin Barrientos Marzan, Stephanie Potenza, Daniel L Rolnik, Natasha Pritchard, Joanne M Said, Kirsten R Palmer, Clare L Whitehead, Penelope M Sheehan, Jolyon Ford and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Lisa HuiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Heidelberg, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Northern Hospital, Northern Health, Epping, Australia; Reproductive Epidemiology Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia. Electronic address: lisa.hui@unimelb.edu.au.
Melvin Barrientos MarzanCentre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Stephanie PotenzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Daniel L RolnikDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Harvard School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Natasha PritchardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
Joanne M SaidDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Maternal-Fetal Medicine Department, Joan Kirner Women's and Children's Hospital, Western Health, St Albans, Australia.
Kirsten R PalmerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Clare L WhiteheadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, Australia.
Penelope M SheehanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Box Hill Hospital, Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia.
Jolyon FordDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Frankston Hospital, Peninsula Health, Australia.
Ben W MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Susan P WalkerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mercy Hospital for Women, Mercy Health, Heidelberg, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUMonash Health · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AUBox Hill Hospital · AUFrankston Hospital · AUHarvard University · USLa Trobe University · AUMercy Hospital for Women · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a worsening of perinatal outcomes in many regions around the world. Melbourne, Australia, had one of the longest and most stringent lockdowns worldwide in 2020 while recording only rare instances of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women.

objectiveThis study aimed to compare the stillbirth and preterm birth rates in women who were exposed or unexposed to lockdown restrictions during pregnancy. STUDY

designThis was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. The lockdown period was defined as the period from March 23, 2020 to March 14, 2021. Routinely-collected maternity data on singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation without congenital anomalies were obtained from all the 12 public hospitals in Melbourne. We defined the lockdown-exposed cohort as those women for whom weeks 20 to 40 of gestation occurred during the lockdown and the unexposed control group as women from the corresponding calendar periods 12 and 24 months before. The main outcome measures were stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (birthweight < third centile), and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to compare the odds of stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise, adjusting for multiple covariates.

resultsThere were 24,817 births in the exposed group and 50,017 births in the control group. There was a significantly higher risk of preterm stillbirth in the exposed group than the control group (0.26% vs 0.18%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.05; P=.015). There was also a significant reduction in the preterm birth of live infants <37 weeks (5.68% vs 6.07%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.99; P=.02), which was largely mediated by a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth (3.01% vs 3.27%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99; P=.03), including iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise (1.25% vs 1.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.93; P=.003). There were also significant reductions in special care nursery admissions during lockdown (11.53% vs 12.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.95; P<.0001). There was a trend to fewer spontaneous preterm births <37 weeks in the exposed group of a similar magnitude to that reported in other countries (2.69% vs 2.82%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.05; P=.32).

conclusionLockdown restrictions in Melbourne, Australia were associated with a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise and a significant increase in preterm stillbirths. This raises concerns that pandemic conditions in 2020 may have led to a failure to identify and appropriately care for pregnant women at an increased risk of antepartum stillbirth. Further research is required to understand the relationship between these 2 findings and to inform our ongoing responses to the pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19Premature BirthCohort StudiesCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHumansIatrogenic DiseaseInfantInfant, NewbornPandemicsPregnancyRetrospective StudiesStillbirthcohort studiesCOVID-19pregnancy outcomepremature birthstillbirth

Identifiers

PMID35452655
PMCPMC9017088
OpenAlexW4224248078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.