Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35452651›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with COVID-19 after medically assisted reproduction: results from the prospective COVID-19-Related Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcome Study.

Yvonne Ziert, Michael Abou-Dakn, Clara Backes, Constanze Banz-Jansen, Nina Bock, Michael Bohlmann, Charlotte Engelbrecht, Teresa Mia Gruber, Antonella Iannaccone, Magdalena Jegen and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Yvonne ZiertInstitute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Michael Abou-DaknDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Joseph Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Clara BackesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, München Klinik Harlaching, Munich, Germany.
Constanze Banz-JansenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Protestant Hospital of Bethel Foundation, University Medical School OWL, Bielefeld, Germany.
Nina BockDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum Hanau, Hanau, Germany.
Michael BohlmannDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Elisabeth Hospital Loerrach, Loerrach, Germany.
Charlotte EngelbrechtDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Teresa Mia GruberDepartment of Obstetrics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Antonella IannacconeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Magdalena JegenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Corinna KeilDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Ioannis KyvernitakisDepartment of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, Asklepios Clinic Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
Katharina LangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albertinen Krankenhaus, Hamburg, Germany.
Angela LihsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikverbund Suedwest, Boeblingen, Germany.
Jula ManzDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, City Hospital, Darmstadt, Deutschland.
Christine MorfeldDepartment of Obstetrics, Diakovere Henriettenstift, Hannover, Germany.
Manuela RichterDepartment of Neonatology, Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult, Kinder- und Jugendkrankenhaus, Hannover, Germany.
Gregor SeligerCenter for Reproductive Medicine & Andrology and Department of Obstetrics & Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Marina SourouniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Clinic, Muenster, Germany.
Constantin Sylvius von KaisenbergDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Silke WegenerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ernst von Bergmann Hospital, Potsdam, Germany.
Ulrich PecksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Frauke von Versen-HöynckDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. Electronic address: vonversen-hoeynck.frauke@mh-hannover.de.
COVID-19-Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS) Network
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEAsklepios Klinik Barmbek · DEDiakovere · DEFoundation University Islamabad · PKKinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult · DEKlinikum Darmstadt · DEKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DEKlinikum Hanau · DEKlinikverbund Südwest · DELMU Klinikum · DEMünchen Klinik Harlaching · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DESt. Elisabeth-Hospital Bochum · DESt. Joseph-Krankenhaus · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 infections in pregnancy have been associated with maternal morbidity, admission to intensive care, and adverse perinatal outcomes such as preterm birth, stillbirth, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. It is unclear whether medically assisted reproduction additionally affects maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with COVID-19.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of medically assisted reproduction on maternal and neonatal outcomes in women with COVID-19 in pregnancy. STUDY

designA total of 1485 women with COVID-19 registered in the COVID-19 Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (a multicentric, prospective, observational cohort study) were included. The maternal and neonatal outcomes in 65 pregnancies achieved with medically assisted reproduction and in 1420 spontaneously conceived pregnancies were compared. We used univariate und multivariate (multinomial) logistic regressions to estimate the (un)adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for adverse outcomes.

resultsThe incidence of COVID-19-associated adverse outcomes (eg, pneumonia, admission to intensive care, and death) was not different in women after conceptions with COVID-19 than in women after medically assisted reproduction pregnancies. Yet, the risk of obstetrical and neonatal complications was higher in pregnancies achieved through medically assisted reproduction. However, medically assisted reproduction was not the primary risk factor for adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes including pregnancy-related hypertensive disorders, gestational diabetes mellitus, cervical insufficiency, peripartum hemorrhage, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, or admission to neonatal intensive care. Maternal age, multiple pregnancies, nulliparity, body mass index >30 (before pregnancy) and multiple gestation contributed differently to the increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with COVID-19 independent of medically assisted reproduction.

conclusionAlthough women with COVID-19 who conceived through fertility treatment experienced a higher incidence of adverse obstetrical and neonatal complications than women with spontaneous conceptions, medically assisted reproduction was not the primary risk factor.

Indexed as

COVID-19Premature BirthFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal AgeOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyPregnancy Outcomeassisted reproductioncohort studyCOVID-19fertility treatmentmaternal outcomesneonatal outcomespregnancypreterm birthSARS-CoV-2 infection

Identifiers

PMID35452651
PMCPMC9015950
OpenAlexW4224259323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.