Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35452136›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2022

Neighborhood socioeconomic status and low-value breast cancer care.

J C Chen, Yaming Li, James L Fisher, Oindrila Bhattacharyya, Allan Tsung, Samilia Obeng-Gyasi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Applying a Novel Measure of Community-Level Healthcare Access to Assess Breast Cancer Care Timeliness.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J C ChenDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4356-5522
Yaming LiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
James L FisherJames Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Oindrila BhattacharyyaDepartment of Economics, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Allan TsungDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Samilia Obeng-GyasiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5330-7247

Funding

Translational Training Grant in Experimental TherapeuticsK12CA133250 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAM E. CARSON, Rosa Lapalombella · 2008 to 2026
$15.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA133250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study is to examine the association between neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) and receipt of low-value breast cancer procedures.

methodsPatients with breast cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Low value procedures included: (1) axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with limited nodal disease receiving breast conservation therapy (BCT); (2) contralateral prophylactic mastectomies (CPM); and (3) sentinel lymph node biopsies (SLNB) in patients ≥70 years old with clinically node negative early-stage hormone-positive breast cancer. The cohort was divided by nSES. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis compared the groups.

resultsThe study included 412 959 patients. Compared to patients in high nSES areas, residing in neighborhoods with low nSES (odd ratio [OR] 2.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.0-2.42) and middle nSES (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.20-1.56) was associated with a higher probability of undergoing low value ALND. Conversely, patients in low SES neighborhoods were less likely to receive low value SLNB (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.85-0.94) or CPM than (low nSES OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.73-0.77); middle nSES OR 0.91 (0.89-0.92) those in high SES neighborhoods.

conclusionIn the SEER Program, low nSES was associated with a lower probability of low value procedures except for ALND utilization.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAgedAxillaFemaleHumansLymph Node ExcisionSentinel Lymph Node BiopsySocial Classbreast cancerneighborhoodsurgeryvalue

Identifiers

PMID35452136
PMCPMC9541043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.