Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451988›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2022

Message Frame-Tailoring in Digital Health Communication: Intervention Redesign and Usability Testing.

Inge S van Strien-Knippenberg, Maria B Altendorf, Ciska Hoving, Julia C M van Weert, Eline S Smit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inge S van Strien-KnippenbergDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0886-9224
Maria B AltendorfDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3771-9783
Ciska HovingDepartment of Health Promotion, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1357-863X
Julia C M van WeertDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-5864
Eline S SmitDepartment of Communication Science, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0250-378X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMessage frame-tailoring based on the need for autonomy is a promising strategy to improve the effectiveness of digital health communication interventions. An example of a digital health communication intervention is Personal Advice in Stopping smoking (PAS), a web-based content-tailored smoking cessation program. PAS was effective in improving cessation success rates, but its effect sizes were small and disappeared after 6 months. Therefore, investigating whether message frame-tailoring based on the individual's need for autonomy might improve effect rates is worthwhile. However, to our knowledge, this has not been studied previously.

objectiveTo investigate whether adding message frame-tailoring based on the need for autonomy increases the effectiveness of content-tailored interventions, the PAS program was redesigned to incorporate message frame-tailoring also. This paper described the process of redesigning the PAS program to include message frame-tailoring, providing smokers with autonomy-supportive or controlling message frames-depending on their individual need for autonomy. Therefore, we aimed to extend framing theory, tailoring theory, and self-determination theory.

methodsExtension of the framing theory, tailoring theory, and self-determination theory by redesigning the PAS program to include message frame-tailoring was conducted in close collaboration with scientific and nonscientific smoking cessation experts (n=10), smokers (n=816), and communication science students (n=19). Various methods were used to redesign the PAS program to include message frame-tailoring with optimal usability: usability testing, think-aloud methodology, heuristic evaluations, and a web-based experiment.

resultsThe most autonomy-supportive and controlling message frames were identified, the cutoff point for the need for autonomy to distinguish between people with high and those with low need for autonomy was determined, and the usability was optimized.

conclusionsThis resulted in a redesigned digital health communication intervention that included message frame-tailoring and had optimal usability. A detailed description of the redesigning process of the PAS program is provided.

trial registrationNetherlands Trial Register NL6512 (NRT6700); https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/6512.

Indexed as

digital health communicationmessage framingsmoking cessation interventionusability testingweb-based computer tailoring

Identifiers

PMID35451988
PMCPMC9073614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.