Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451983›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2022

Modeling Data Journeys to Inform the Digital Transformation of Kidney Transplant Services: Observational Study.

Videha Sharma, Iliada Eleftheriou, Sabine N van der Veer, Andrew Brass, Titus Augustine, John Ainsworth

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Videha SharmaCentre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7640-1239
Iliada EleftheriouCentre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8474-4303
Sabine N van der VeerCentre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0929-436X
Andrew BrassCentre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0389-7058
Titus AugustineDepartment of Renal and Pancreatic Transplantation, Manchester University National Health Service Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7391-1839
John AinsworthCentre for Health Informatics, Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2187-9195
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBNational Health Service · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData journey modeling is a methodology used to establish a high-level overview of information technology (IT) infrastructure in health care systems. It allows a better understanding of sociotechnical barriers and thus informs meaningful digital transformation. Kidney transplantation is a complex clinical service involving multiple specialists and providers. The referral pathway for a transplant requires the centralization of patient data across multiple IT solutions and health care organizations. At present, there is a poor understanding of the role of IT in this process, specifically regarding the management of patient data, clinical communication, and workflow support.

objectiveTo apply data journey modeling to better understand interoperability, data access, and workflow requirements of a regional multicenter kidney transplant service.

methodsAn incremental methodology was used to develop the data journey model. This included review of service documents, domain expert interviews, and iterative modeling sessions. Results were analyzed based on the LOAD (landscape, organizations, actors, and data) framework to provide a meaningful assessment of current data management challenges and inform ways for IT to overcome these challenges.

resultsResults were presented as a diagram of the organizations (n=4), IT systems (n>9), actors (n>4), and data journeys (n=0) involved in the transplant referral pathway. The diagram revealed that all movement of data was dependent on actor interaction with IT systems and manual transcription of data into Microsoft Word (Microsoft, Inc) documents. Each actor had between 2 and 5 interactions with IT systems to capture all relevant data, a process that was reported to be time consuming and error prone. There was no interoperability within or across organizations, which led to delays as clinical teams manually transferred data, such as medical history and test results, via post or email.

conclusionsOverall, data journey modeling demonstrated that human actors, rather than IT systems, formed the central focus of data movement. The IT landscape did not complement this workflow and exerted a significant administrative burden on clinical teams. Based on this study, future solutions must consider regional interoperability and specialty-specific views of data to support multi-organizational clinical services such as transplantation.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationCommunicationDelivery of Health CareHumansWorkflowdata journey modellingdigital transformationhealth information exchangeinteroperabilitykidney transplantationmedical informatics

Identifiers

PMID35451983
PMCPMC9073622
OpenAlexW4224249606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.