Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451979›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2022

Problems and Barriers Related to the Use of Digital Health Applications: Protocol for a Scoping Review.

Godwin Denk Giebel, Christian Speckemeier, Carina Abels, Kirstin Börchers, Jürgen Wasem, Nikola Blase, Silke Neusser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Godwin Denk GiebelInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-1927
Christian SpeckemeierInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7507-4432
Carina AbelsInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-2944
Kirstin BörchersQM BÖRCHERS CONSULTING+, Herne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7944-8531
Jürgen WasemInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9653-168X
Nikola BlaseInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3774-5009
Silke NeusserInstitute for Healthcare Management and Research, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9077-7005

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of mobile health (mHealth) apps is increasing rapidly worldwide. More and more institutions and organizations develop regulations and guidelines to enable an evidence-based and safe use. In Germany, mHealth apps fulfilling predefined criteria (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen [DiGA]) can be prescribed and are reimbursable by the German statutory health insurance scheme. Due to the increasing distribution of DiGA, problems and barriers should receive special attention.

objectiveThis study aims to identify the relevant problems and barriers related to the use of mHealth apps fulfilling the criteria of DiGA.

methodsThis scoping review will follow published methodological frameworks and the PRISMA-Scr (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) criteria. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and JMIR), reference lists of relevant articles, and grey literature sources will be searched. Two reviewers will assess the eligibility of the articles by a two-stage (title and abstract as well as full text) screening process. Only problems and barriers related to mHealth apps fulfilling the criteria of DiGA are included for this research. The identified studies will be categorized and analyzed with MAXQDA.

resultsThis scoping review gives an overview of the available evidence and identifies research gaps regarding problems and barriers related to DiGA. The results are planned to be submitted to an indexed, peer-reviewed journal in the first quarter of 2022.

conclusionsThis is the first review to identify the problems and barriers related to the use of mHealth apps fulfilling the German definition of DiGA. Nevertheless, the findings can be applied to other contexts and health care systems as well. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/32702.

Indexed as

DHAdigital health applicationelectronic databasehealth databasehealth insurancemHealth appmHealth, problems, barriers, scoping reviewmobile health

Identifiers

PMID35451979
PMCPMC9073601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.