Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451851›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2022

Multidelay ASL of the pediatric brain.

Xavier Golay, Mai-Lan Ho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ISMRM Clinical Focus Meeting 2023: "Imaging the Fire in the Brain".Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xavier GolayMR Neurophysics and Translational Neuroscience, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology London, London, England, UK.
Mai-Lan HoRadiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9455-1350

Funding

Longitudinal Neuroimaging in Sturge-Weber SyndromeR01NS041922 · NINDS · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JUHASZ, CSABA · 2003 to 2024
$6.2M
A comprehensive deep learning framework for MRI reconstructionR01EB029957 · NIBIB · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI AHMAD, RIZWAN, SCHNITER, PHILIP · 2021 to 2024
$2.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029957NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS041922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a powerful noncontrast MRI technique for evaluation of cerebral blood flow (CBF). A key parameter in single-delay ASL is the choice of postlabel delay (PLD), which refers to the timing between the labeling of arterial free water and measurement of flow into the brain. Multidelay ASL (MDASL) utilizes several PLDs to improve the accuracy of CBF calculations using arterial transit time (ATT) correction. This approach is particularly helpful in situations where ATT is unknown, including young subjects and slow-flow conditions. In this article, we discuss the technical considerations for MDASL, including labeling techniques, quantitative metrics, and technical artefacts. We then provide a practical summary of key clinical applications with real-life imaging examples in the pediatric brain, including stroke, vasculopathy, hypoxic-ischemic injury, epilepsy, migraine, tumor, infection, and metabolic disease.

Indexed as

BrainCerebrovascular CirculationArtifactsChildHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSpin LabelsSpin Labels

Identifiers

PMID35451851
PMCPMC10996417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.