ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022
Accounting for Correlation Between Traits in Genomic Prediction.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Advances in multi-trait genomic prediction approaches: classification, comparative analysis, and perspectives.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- GWAS-assisted and multitrait genomic prediction for improvement of seed yield and canning quality traits in a black bean breeding panel.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2025Article
- Maintenance of UK bread baking quality: Trends in wheat quality traits over 50 years of breeding and potential for future application of genomic-assisted selection.The plant genome · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic enabled prediction is playing a key role for the success of genomic selection (GS). However, according to the No Free Lunch Theorem, there is not a universal model that performs well for all data sets. Due to this, many statistical and machine learning models are available for genomic prediction. When multitrait data is available, models that are able to account for correlations between phenotypic traits are preferred, since these models help increase the prediction accuracy when the degree of correlation is moderate to large. For this reason, in this chapter we review multitrait models for genome-enabled prediction and we illustrate the power of this model with real examples. In addition, we provide details of the software (R code) available for its application to help users implement these models with its own data. The multitrait models were implemented under conventional Bayesian Ridge regression and best linear unbiased predictor, but also under a deep learning framework. The multitrait deep learning framework helps implement prediction models with mixed outcomes (continuous, binary, ordinal, and count, measured on different scales), which is not easy in conventional statistical models. The illustrative examples are very detailed in order to make the implementation of multitrait models in plant and animal breeding friendlier for breeders and scientists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35451780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.