Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451775›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Overview of Genomic Prediction Methods and the Associated Assumptions on the Variance of Marker Effect, and on the Architecture of the Target Trait.

Réka Howard, Diego Jarquin, José Crossa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Portability of genomic predictions trained on sparse factorial designs across two maize silage breeding cycles.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Réka HowardUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. rekahoward@unl.edu.
Diego JarquinUniversity of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is a methodology that revolutionized the process of breeding improved genetic materials in plant and animal breeding programs. It uses predicted genomic values of the potential of untested/unobserved genotypes as surrogates of phenotypes during the selection process. Such that the predicted genomic values are obtained using exclusively the marker profiles of the untested genotypes, and these potentially can be used by breeders for screening the genotypes to be advanced in the breeding pipeline, to identify potential parents for next improvement cycles, or to find optimal crosses for targeting genotypes among others. Conceptually, GS initially requires a set of genotypes with both molecular marker information and phenotypic data for model calibration and then the performance of untested genotypes is predicted using their marker profiles only. Hence, it is expected that breeders would look at these values in order to conduct selections. Even though the concept of GS seems trivial, due to the high dimensional nature of the data delivered from modern sequencing technologies where the number of molecular markers (p) excess by far the number of data points available for model fitting (n; p ≫ n) a complete renovated set of prediction models was needed to cope with this challenge. In this chapter, we provide a conceptual framework for comparing statistical models to overcome the "large p, small n problem." Given the very large diversity of GS models only the most popular are presented here; mainly we focused on linear regression-based models and nonparametric models that predict the genetic estimated breeding values (GEBV) in a single environment considering a single trait only, mainly in the context of plant breeding.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSelection, GeneticAnimalsGenomeGenomicsGenotypePhenotypeGenomic estimate of breeding valuesGenomic selection“large p, small n problem”Prediction models

Identifiers

PMID35451775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.