Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451735›Full record

SynthesisAging clinical and experimental research2022

Applicability of the interventions recommended for patients at risk or with delirium in medical and post-acute settings: a systematic review and a Nominal Group Technique study.

Luisa Sist, Nikita Valentina Ugenti, Gloria Donati, Silvia Cedioli, Irene Mansutti, Ermellina Zanetti, Maria Macchiarulo, Rossella Messina, Paola Rucci, Alvisa Palese

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Luisa SistDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40138, Bologna, Italy. luisa.sist@unibo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1283-7364
Nikita Valentina UgentiIRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8284-2679
Gloria DonatiAlma Mater, Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Silvia CedioliAlma Mater, Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Irene MansuttiDepartment of Medical Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Ermellina ZanettiFondazione Brescia Solidale, APRIRE Network, Brescia, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1404-4867
Maria MacchiaruloAcute Geriatrics, Orthogeriatrics and Cognitive Disorders and Dementia Center - Department of Continuity and Integration, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Rossella MessinaDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40138, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5526-9769
Paola RucciDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Via Ugo Foscolo 7, 40138, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7704-0831
Alvisa PaleseDepartment of Medical Science, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3508-844X
University of Bologna · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · ITUniversity of Udine · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelirium is a common condition during hospitalisation that should be prevented and treated. Several recommendations have been established to date, whereas few studies have investigated their applicability in daily practice for medical and post-acute settings.

aimThe aim of this research exercise was to emerge the applicability of the interventions recommended by studies in the daily care of patients at risk or with delirium cared in medical and post-acute settings.

methodsThe study was organised in three phases. A systematic literature review according to Centre for Reviews and Dissemination was conducted (January-February 2021). Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Scopus, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Psychological Information Database, and the Joanna Briggs Institute databases were searched. Primary and secondary studies were evaluated in their methodological quality with the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme, and the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation. Then, the interventions identified were assessed in their applicability using the Nominal Group Technique who ranked their judgement on a four-point Likert scale from 1 (totally inapplicable) to 4 (totally applicable). Qualitative feedbacks were also considered, and a validation of the final list was performed by the Nominal Group.

resultsA total of 12 studies were included producing a list of 96 interventions categorised into four macro-areas (prevention, non-pharmacological, communication and pharmacological management). The Nominal Group identified 51 interventions (average score > 3.5) as applicable in medical and post-acute settings. Then, through a process of re-reading, and revising according to the comments provided by the Nominal Group, a list of 35 interventions out of the initial 96 were judged as applicable.

conclusionApplicability should be assessed with experts in the field to understand the involved factors. One-third of interventions have been judged as applicable in the Italian context; the nurses' expertise, the work environment features, and the time required for each intervention in a high workload setting may prevent the full applicability of the interventions recommended by the literature.

Indexed as

DeliriumHospitalizationHumansApplicabilityDeliriumInterventionsMedical unitsNursingPost-acute unitsRiskTreatments

Identifiers

PMID35451735
OpenAlexW4224273047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.