Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451648›Full record

SynthesisCell and tissue research2022

Fish collagen for skin wound healing: a systematic review in experimental animal studies.

Amanda de Souza, Matheus de Almeida Cruz, Tiago Akira Tashiro de Araújo, Julia Risso Parisi, Giovanna Caroline Aparecida do Vale, Karolyne Dos Santos Jorge Sousa, Daniel Araki Ribeiro, Renata Neves Granito, Ana Claudia Muniz Renno

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cell and tissue research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda de SouzaDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.
Matheus de Almeida CruzDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.
Tiago Akira Tashiro de AraújoDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.
Julia Risso ParisiDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.
Giovanna Caroline Aparecida do ValeDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.
Karolyne Dos Santos Jorge SousaDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7780-3862
Daniel Araki RibeiroDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.
Renata Neves GranitoDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil.
Ana Claudia Muniz RennoDepartment of Biosciences, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), Lab 342, 136 Silva Jardim Street, Santos, SP, 11015020, Brazil. a.renno@unifesp.br.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRFundação de Apoio à Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Collagen extracted from fishes has been appearing as an alternative for commercial porcine and bovine collagen and it has been considered interesting especially for membrane manufacturing in tissue engineering. Despite the positive in vitro effects of fish collagen membranes, there is still no understanding of all the benefits that this natural biomaterial plays in the wound healing process, due to the lack of compilation of the results obtained in animal studies. In this sense, the purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to examine the effects of fish collagen membranes for skin wound healing in experimental models of skin wound. The search was carried out according to the orientations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA), and the descriptors of the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) were defined: "fish," collagen," "skin," and "in vivo". A total of 10 articles were retrieved from the databases PubMed and Scopus. After the elegibility analyses, this review covers the different origins of fish collagen reported in the different papers from the beginning of 2015 through the middle of 2021. The results were based mainly on histological analysis and macroscopic evaluation, and fish skin collagen was responsible for improving the wound healing rate and the process of reepithelization and collagen deposition. In conclusion, fish skin collagen has shown positive results in in vivo studies and may be a potential biomaterial in tissue engineering.

Indexed as

CollagenWound HealingAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCattleFishesSkinSwineBiocompatible MaterialsCollagenFish collagenIn vivo studiesMarine biotecnologyTissue engineeringWound healing

Identifiers

PMID35451648
OpenAlexW4224213023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.