ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022
CT radiomics signature: a potential biomarker for fibroblast activation protein expression in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating Radiomics and Computational Pathology to Predict Early Recurrence of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Uncover Its Biological Basis in Tumor Microenvironment.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic role of fibroblast-activation protein in gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo develop and validate a radiomics model to predict fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
methodsThis retrospective study included consecutive 152 patients with PDAC who underwent MDCT scan and surgical resection from January 2017 to December 2017 (training set) and from January 2018 to April 2018 (validation set). In the training set, 1409 portal radiomic features were extracted from each patient's preoperative imaging. Optimal features were selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression algorithm, whereupon the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) was developed using the radiomics features. The performance of the XGBoost classifier performance was assessed by its calibration, discrimination, and clinical usefulness.
resultsThe patients were divided into FAP-low (n = 91; 59.87%) and FAP-high (n = 61; 40.13%) groups according to the optimal FAP cutoff (45.71%). Patients in the FAP-low group showed longer survival. The XGBoost classifier comprised 13 selected radiomics features and showed good discrimination in the training set [area under the curve (AUC), 0.97] and the validation set (AUC, 0.75). It also performed well in the calibration test and decision-curve analysis, demonstrating its potential clinical value.
conclusionsThe XGBoost classifier based on CT radiomics in the portal venous phase can non-invasively predict FAP expression and may help to improve clinical decision-making in patients with PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.