Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451543›Full record

ArticleInternal medicine journal2022

Are we underutilising computer tomography colonography in Australia?

Shawn Z Lee, Jonathon P Schubert, Simon J B Prowse, Robert V Bryant

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Internal medicine journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shawn Z LeeMedical School, Faculty of Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0466-4915
Jonathon P SchubertMedical School, Faculty of Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7201-1188
Simon J B ProwseIBD Service, Department of Gastroenterology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Robert V BryantMedical School, Faculty of Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-3289
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · AUBasil Hetzel Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computed tomography colonography (CTC) is a safe and accurate tool for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. CTC requires dedicated radiological expertise and demonstrates a high sensitivity and specificity in polyp detection, which is similar to optical colonoscopy (OC). Newer preparation techniques for CTC, such as faecal tagging without catharsis might further improve both the tolerability and accuracy of the test. While exposure to ionising radiation, lack of capacity for therapeutic intervention and potentially diminished sensitivity for flat serrated polyps are limitations of CTC, the technique has a role in select populations. CTC should be considered in frail or elderly patients at high anaesthetic risk for OC, patients with stricturing colonic lesions as well as incomplete colonoscopy, or in patients at risk of delayed access to timely OC. With an ever-growing demand for endoscopic services, increased utilisation of CTC could reduce waiting times for colonoscopy, thereby broadening access to timely and effective CRC screening. Further research is required to improve further the detection of flat lesions, including sessile serrated polyps.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonography, Computed TomographicColorectal NeoplasmsAgedColonoscopyComputersHumansSensitivity and SpecificityTomographybowel cancerbowel cancer screeningcomputed tomography colonoscopy

Identifiers

PMID35451543
PMCPMC9321686
OpenAlexW4224279326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.