Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451501›Full record

ReviewActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022

Standardized 10-step approach for successfully performing a hysterectomy via vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Susanne Housmans, Andrea Stuart, Jan Bosteels, Jan Deprest, Jan Baekelandt

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Susanne HousmansDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5148-4883
Andrea StuartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsingborg Hospital, Helsingborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5131-6297
Jan BosteelsDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jan DeprestDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-4920-945X
Jan BaekelandtDepartment of Development and Regeneration, Faculty of Medicine, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Imelda Hospital · BEKU Leuven · BELund University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a novel technique for minimally invasive gynecological surgery. Adequate training and standardization are key elements to patient safety and quality of care. Based on consensus statements and expert opinion; we report a step-by-step guidance for hysterectomy via natural orifice transluminal endoscopy. A detailed description is presented of pre- and postoperative care, and the instruments and equipment used, and surgical steps are illustrated by photographic images. This report can guide surgeons in their training to perform a hysterectomy via NOTES.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgerySurgeonsFemaleHumansHysterectomyHysterectomy, VaginalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresVaginahysterectomynatural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgeryNOTESvaginal hysterectomyvNOTES

Identifiers

PMID35451501
PMCPMC9564811
OpenAlexW4224261204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.