Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451464›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Convergent evolution of polyploid genomes from across the eukaryotic tree of life.

Yue Hao, Jonathon Fleming, Joanna Petterson, Eric Lyons, Patrick P Edger, J Chris Pires, Jeffrey L Thorne, Gavin C Conant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Global modulation of gene expression and transcriptome size in aneuploid combinations of maize.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Annual review of genetics · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. POInTBMC bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Yue HaoBiodesign Center for Mechanisms of Evolution, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5065-8906
Jonathon FlemingBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Joanna PettersonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Eric LyonsSchool of Plant Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3348-8845
Patrick P EdgerDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
J Chris PiresInternational Plant Science Center, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9682-2639
Jeffrey L ThorneBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-5743
Gavin C ConantBioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8677-4933
North Carolina State University · USArizona State University · USMichigan State University · USNew York Botanical Garden · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Trinucleotide Repeats: Atypical Structures, Diseases, and EvolutionR01GM118508 · NIGMS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI SAGUI, MARIA CELESTE · 2016 to 2019
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By modeling the homoeologous gene losses that occurred in 50 genomes deriving from ten distinct polyploidy events, we show that the evolutionary forces acting on polyploids are remarkably similar, regardless of whether they occur in flowering plants, ciliates, fishes, or yeasts. We show that many of the events show a relative rate of duplicate gene loss before the first postpolyploidy speciation that is significantly higher than in later phases of their evolution. The relatively weak selective constraint experienced by the single-copy genes these losses produced leads us to suggest that most of the purely selectively neutral duplicate gene losses occur in the immediate postpolyploid period. Nearly all of the events show strong evidence of biases in the duplicate losses, consistent with them being allopolyploidies, with 2 distinct progenitors contributing to the modern species. We also find ongoing and extensive reciprocal gene losses (alternative losses of duplicated ancestral genes) between these genomes. With the exception of a handful of closely related taxa, all of these polyploid organisms are separated from each other by tens to thousands of reciprocal gene losses. As a result, it is very unlikely that viable diploid hybrid species could form between these taxa, since matings between such hybrids would tend to produce offspring lacking essential genes. It is, therefore, possible that the relatively high frequency of recurrent polyploidies in some lineages may be due to the ability of new polyploidies to bypass reciprocal gene loss barriers.

Indexed as

EukaryotaEvolution, MolecularDiploidyHumansPhylogenyPolyploidyconvergent evolutionevolutionary modelpolyploidyreciprocal gene loss

Identifiers

PMID35451464
PMCPMC9157103
OpenAlexW4226282820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.