ArticleMedicine2022
Effects of the working experience, educational background, professional titles, and hospital grades of intensive care unit doctors on clinical glucocorticoid use in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Article in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Glucocorticoid Treatment in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: An Overview on Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Benefit.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
abstractAlthough glucocorticoids are commonly used for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome in the intensive care unit, the exact attitudes of different intensive care unit (ICU) doctors about glucocorticoid usage are largely unknown. Herein, we investigated the practice of glucocorticoid application for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) by ICU doctors in China. Questionnaires were developed and sent to ICU doctors at 45 hospitals to perform statistics and analysis. ICU doctors with more working experience and professional titles had more knowledge of ARDS. Glucocorticoids were more likely to be used for ARDS caused by chemical inhalation. Doctors with longer working experience, better educational background, and higher professional titles used fewer glucocorticoids. In addition, 97.2%of the doctors considered using methylprednisolone or hydrocortisone first, 50.9% used glucocorticoids within 24hours of onset, and 37.1% insisted that steroid therapy should last 3 to 5days. Although ICU doctors with more working experience and professional titles have a better understanding of glucocorticoid use in ARDS, the majority of clinical practices and attitudes are similar among different doctors regardless of working experience, educational background, professional titles, or hospital grades.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.