Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35451156›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer care2022

Work, daily activities and leisure after cancer.

Marjon Faaij, Dounya Schoormans, Alison Pearce

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Work, daily activities and leisure after cancer.European journal of cancer care · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marjon FaaijUniversity Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Dounya SchoormansDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Alison PearceCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5690-9542

Funding

Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation via the Cancer Australia funded Cancer Research Economics Support TeamUniversity of Technology Sydney
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDetermine if cancer survivors have lower participation in paid work, more limitations in daily activities or more limitations in leisure compared with those without cancer, stratified by age (working age ≤65 years; retirement age >65 years). Secondary objectives are identifying sociodemographic or clinical factors associated with work, daily activities or leisure and analysis of the relationship between work, daily activities and leisure.

methodsSecondary analyses, using logistic regression, were performed on three cohorts (lymphoma, prostate and thyroid cancer) from the Dutch Patient Reported Outcomes Following Initial treatment and Long-term Evaluation of Survivorship (PROFILES) registry and a nationally representative non-cancer sample.

resultsWorking-age cancer survivors (n = 926) were significantly (p < 0.001) less likely to participate in paid work and more likely to report limitations in daily activities and leisure compared to the non-cancer cohort (n = 1279). Among retirement aged cancer survivors (n = 1046), paid work was significantly more likely (p < 0.001), as were limitations in leisure (p < 0.05), compared with the non-cancer controls (n = 334).

conclusionsCancer impacts daily activities and leisure, as well as paid work. These roles are important for cancer survivors' quality of life, suggesting support to return to these activities may be an important component of survivorship care.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsNeoplasmsAgedHumansLeisure ActivitiesMaleQuality of LifeSurvivorshipcancerdaily activitiesleisuresurvivorshipunpaid workwork

Identifiers

PMID35451156
PMCPMC9542011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.