Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35450888›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of a Spanish version of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire.

Jose Ignacio de Juan-Roldán, Marcos Castillo-Jimena, Alba González-Hevilla, Clara Sánchez-Sánchez, Antonio J García-Ruiz, Enrique Gavilán-Moral

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Jose Ignacio de Juan-RoldánDepartment of Pharmacology and Paediatrics, Universidad de Málaga. Facultad de Medicina, Málaga, Spain dejuanroldan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1780-5975
Marcos Castillo-JimenaDepartment of Pharmacology and Paediatrics, Universidad de Málaga. Facultad de Medicina, Málaga, Spain.
Alba González-HevillaDepartment of Pharmacology and Paediatrics, Universidad de Málaga. Facultad de Medicina, Málaga, Spain.
Clara Sánchez-SánchezAlde Zaharra Health Centre, Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Donostia, Spain.
Antonio J García-RuizDepartment of Pharmacology and Paediatrics, Universidad de Málaga. Facultad de Medicina, Málaga, Spain.
Enrique Gavilán-MoralLaboratory of Innovative Practices in Polymedication and Health, Plasencia, Cáceres, Spain.
Andalusian Health Service · ESBiomedical Research Institute · USCentro de Emergencias Sanitarias 061 · ESHospital Virgen del Puerto · ESOsakidetza · ESUniversidad de Málaga · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSuccessful deprescribing depends largely on factors related to the patient. The revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire was developed with the objective of evaluating the beliefs and attitudes of older adults and caregivers towards deprescribing. The present study was designed to validate a Spanish version of the rPATD questionnaire, both the versions for older adults and for caregivers, through a qualitative validation phase and the analysis of its psychometric properties.

designCross-sectional validation study.

settingPrimary care settings in Málaga (Spain).

participantsA sample of 120 subjects (60 patients with polypharmacy and 60 caregivers of patients with polypharmacy) were enrolled in the study.

main outcome measuresIn the qualitative validation stage, the rPATD questionnaire was translated/back-translated and subjected to a cross-cultural adaptation to evaluate its face validity and feasibility. Next, its psychometric properties were assessed. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity. Internal consistency was determined using Cronbach's alpha test. Criterion validity through pre-established hypotheses from the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) Specific-Concerns Scale, and test-retest reliability were analysed.

resultsConfirmatory factor analysis verified the four-factor structure of the original rPATD questionnaire, with items loading into four factors:

conclusionsThe Spanish version of the rPATD questionnaire is a feasible, valid and reliable instrument to evaluate attitudes towards deprescribing in Spanish-speaking patients and caregivers.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsAgedAttitudeCross-Cultural ComparisonCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesCaregiversDeprescribingPatientPreferencesPolypharmacyPsychometric propertiesSpain

Identifiers

PMID35450888
PMCPMC9024262
OpenAlexW4224238602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.