ArticleBiophysical journal2022
Muscle active force-length curve explained by an electrophysical model of interfilament spacing.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cross-bridge model for predicting muscle short-range stiffness during movement.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- The Relationship Between Length and Active Force for Submaximal Skeletal Muscle Contractions: a Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- Tumor microenvironment and immune-related myositis: addressing muscle wasting in cancer immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Cardiac length-dependent activation driven by force-dependent thick-filament dynamics.Biophysical journal · 2024Article
- The effect of muscle ultrastructure on the force, displacement and work capacity of skeletal muscle.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024Article
- Structurally motivated models to explain the muscle's force-length relationship.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Sarcomere mechanics in the double-actin-overlap zone.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- A theory of physiological similarity in muscle-driven motion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- In silico modeling of patient-specific blood rheology in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- A biomechanical model for the relation between bite force and mandibular opening angle in arthropods.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- Article
- An expanding explanation for the ascending limb of muscle's active force-length relationship.Biophysical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The active isometric force-length relation (FLR) of striated muscle sarcomeres is central to understanding and modeling muscle function. The mechanistic basis of the descending arm of the FLR is well explained by the decreasing thin:thick filament overlap that occurs at long sarcomere lengths. The mechanistic basis of the ascending arm of the FLR (the decrease in force that occurs at short sarcomere lengths), alternatively, has never been well explained. Because muscle is a constant-volume system, interfilament lattice distances must increase as sarcomere length shortens. This increase would decrease thin and thick-filament electrostatic interactions independently of thin:thick filament overlap. To examine this effect, we present here a fundamental, physics-based model of the sarcomere that includes filament molecular properties, calcium binding, sarcomere geometry including both thin:thick filament overlap and interfilament radial distance, and electrostatics. The model gives extremely good fits to existing FLR data from a large number of different muscles across their entire range of measured activity levels, with the optimized parameter values in all cases lying within anatomically and physically reasonable ranges. A local first-order sensitivity analysis (varying individual parameters while holding the values of all others constant) shows that model output is most sensitive to a subset of model parameters, most of which are related to sarcomere geometry, with model output being most sensitive to interfilament radial distance. This conclusion is supported by re-running the fits with only this parameter subset being allowed to vary, which increases fit errors only moderately. These results show that the model well reproduces existing experimental data, and indicate that changes in interfilament spacing play as central a role as changes in filament overlap in determining the FLR, particularly on its ascending arm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.