ReviewInterface focus2022
Multi-synchronization and other patterns of multi-rhythmicity in oscillatory biological systems.
Review in Interface focus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- How nature discovers rare Turing islands: Exploration by common limit cycles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Embryo Development in a Stochastic Universe.Bioelectricity · 2024Article
- Nonlinear dynamics in phosphoinositide metabolism.Current opinion in cell biology · 2024Review
- Oscillator death in coupled biochemical oscillators.Mathematics of control, signals, and systems : MCSS · 2023Article
- Multi-synchronization and other patterns of multi-rhythmicity in oscillatory biological systems.Interface focus · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While experimental and theoretical studies have established the prevalence of rhythmic behaviour at all levels of biological organization, less common is the coexistence between multiple oscillatory regimes (multi-rhythmicity), which has been predicted by a variety of models for biological oscillators. The phenomenon of multi-rhythmicity involves, most commonly, the coexistence between two (birhythmicity) or three (trirhythmicity) distinct regimes of self-sustained oscillations. Birhythmicity has been observed experimentally in a few chemical reactions and in biological examples pertaining to cardiac cell physiology, neurobiology, human voice patterns and ecology. The present study consists of two parts. We first review the mechanisms underlying multi-rhythmicity in models for biochemical and cellular oscillations in which the phenomenon was investigated over the years. In the second part, we focus on the coupling of the cell cycle and the circadian clock and show how an additional source of multi-rhythmicity arises from the bidirectional coupling of these two cellular oscillators. Upon bidirectional coupling, the two oscillatory networks generally synchronize in a unique manner characterized by a single, common period. In some conditions, however, the two oscillators may synchronize in two or three different ways characterized by distinct waveforms and periods. We refer to this type of multi-rhythmicity as 'multi-synchronization'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.