ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2022
Current Trends in Breast Reconstruction following Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trends in breast reconstruction for BRCA1/2, PALB2 and other high penetrance germline pathogenic variant carriers undergoing risk reducing mastectomy.Familial cancer · 2026Article
- Cumulative Medical Costs of Prepectoral Versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Using Machine Learning as a Seroma Risk Assessment Tool in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Greater Health Resources Are Used for Direct-to-implant Breast Reconstruction in Women With Higher Body Mass Index.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Effects of breast size on breast reconstruction in BRCA mutation carriers and genetic high-risk patients after bilateral mastectomy.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025Article
- Are There Disparities in Breast Reconstruction After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy?The Journal of surgical research · 2024Article
- Autologous vs. implant-based breast reconstruction after skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy-A deeper insight considering surgical and patient-reported outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with genetic susceptibility to breast cancer may pursue bilateral prophylactic mastectomy (BPM) and subsequent breast reconstruction. This study aimed to characterize immediate reconstructive trends following BPM. Methods: The ACS-NSQIP database (2010 -2019) was used to examine differences in demographics and operative outcomes based on breast reconstruction technique following BPM and factors predicting reconstruction type. Results: Of 1945 patients (mean age, 43.8 ± 11.3 years), implant-based reconstruction (IBR) was most frequently (71.8%) performed following BPM. Patients who underwent IBR (n = 1396) were younger (42.6 years, Conclusion: This is the first large-scale study of genetically susceptible patients who underwent BPM demonstrating a significant relationship between patient demographics, operative outcomes, and immediate reconstruction technique. These results provide valuable insight for surgeons and patients during the shared decision-making process.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.