Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35450182›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2022

A new handheld fundus camera combined with visual artificial intelligence facilitates diabetic retinopathy screening.

Shang Ruan, Yang Liu, Wei-Ting Hu, Hui-Xun Jia, Shan-Shan Wang, Min-Lu Song, Meng-Xi Shen, Da-Wei Luo, Tao Ye, Feng-Hua Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modern Approach to Diabetic Retinopathy Diagnostics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Shang RuanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Wei-Ting HuShanghai Phoebus Medical Co. Ltd., Shanghai 200000, China.
Hui-Xun JiaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Shan-Shan WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Min-Lu SongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Meng-Xi ShenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Da-Wei LuoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Tao YeWest Nanjing Road Community Health Center, Shanghai 200000, China.
Feng-Hua WangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200080, China.
Shanghai Chest Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the performance in diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening of artificial intelligence (AI) system by evaluating the image quality of a handheld Optomed Aurora fundus camera in comparison to traditional tabletop fundus cameras and the diagnostic accuracy of DR of the two modalities.

methodsOverall, 630 eyes were included from three centers and screened by a handheld camera (Aurora, Optomed, Oulu, Finland) and a table-top camera. Image quality was graded by three masked and experienced ophthalmologists. The diagnostic accuracy of the handheld camera and AI system was evaluated in assessing DR lesions and referable DR.

resultsUnder nonmydriasis status, the handheld fundus camera had better image quality in centration, clarity, and visible range (1.47, 1.48, and 1.40) than conventional tabletop cameras (1.30, 1.28, and 1.18;

conclusionThe handheld Aurora fundus camera combined with autonomous AI system is well-suited in DR screening without mydriasis because of its high sensitivity of DR detection as well as its image quality, but its specificity needs to be improved with better modeling of the data. Use of this new system is safe and effective in the detection of referable DR in real world practice.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediabetic retinopathyhandheld cameraimage quality

Identifiers

PMID35450182
PMCPMC8995718
OpenAlexW4220736198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.