ArticleApplied bionics and biomechanics2022
Research on Protection Performance of Surge Protective Devices against Electromagnetic Pulse.
Article in Applied bionics and biomechanics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Dopants and Processing Parameters on the Properties of ZnO-VMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Retracted: Research on Protection Performance of Surge Protective Devices against Electromagnetic Pulse.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-11-01Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate the protection performance of SPD (surge protective device) against electromagnetic pulse, the response ability of several typical surge protective devices to wide and narrow electromagnetic pulses was tested by using a SPD response ability test system. The results showed that SPD commonly used in lightning surge protection had certain ability to suppress electromagnetic pulse conduction disturbance. Gas discharge tubes presented typical clamping characteristics for wide pulses. MOV and TVS had obvious clamping effect on wide pulses, while had no clamping effect on narrow pulses, but could obviously reduce its peak value. Zener diodes had obvious clamping effect on narrow pulses, and the clamping voltage control accuracy was high.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.