Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35450087›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient experience2022

Orthopedic Providers' Preferences for Education and Training on Psychosocial Clinical Research Initiatives: A Qualitative Investigation.

Isabell Sagar, Paula J Popok, Mira Reichman, Ethan G Lester, James Doorley, Jafar Bakhshaie, Ana Maria Vranceanu

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient experience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Isabell SagarIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Paula J PopokIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Mira ReichmanIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ethan G LesterIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
James DoorleyIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Jafar BakhshaieIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Ana Maria VranceanuIntegrated Brain Health Clinical and Research Program, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-6488
Harvard University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Orthopedic Injury; A multi-site feasibility study to prevent persistent pain and disabilityR01AT010462 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VRANCEANU, ANA-MARIA · 2021 to 2023
$2.4M
Toolkit for Optimal Recovery after Orthopedic Injury; A multi-site feasibility study to prevent persistent pain and disabilityU01AT010462 · NCCIH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI VRANCEANU, ANA-MARIA · 2020 to 2020
$800k
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT010462NCCIH NIH HHS U01 AT010462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPsychosocial factors (e.g., depression, anxiety) increase risk for chronic pain, disability, and other health complications following acute orthopedic traumatic injury. Orthopedic providers lack skills to address these factors. Education around psychosocial factors of recovery and psychosocial clinical and research initiatives could address this gap. The purpose of this study was to understand orthopedic trauma providers' preferences for the design and distribution of educational materials to facilitate psychosocial initiative implementation.

methodsWe conducted live-video, semi-structured focus groups with outpatient orthopedic trauma providers across three Level 1 Trauma Centers, using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach to analyze qualitative data and extract themes and subthemes characterizing providers' recommendations for appropriate psychosocial education.

resultsFour themes described providers' recommendations for receiving educational materials: (1) provide foundational knowledge and tools about psychosocial factors; (2) provide information regarding a psychosocial initiative's purpose and procedures; (3) leverage educational materials to maximize buy-in to psychosocial clinical research initiatives; and (4) deliver information concisely, clearly, and electronically.

conclusionOrthopedic providers recommended ways to optimize design and dissemination of education on psychosocial care. Optimizing knowledge of psychosocial factors and clinical and research initiatives facilitates providers' ability to appropriately target the often-underdressed psychosocial component of recovery in orthopedics.

Indexed as

orthopedic traumapsychosocial carepsychosocial factorspsychosocial initiativerecovery

Identifiers

PMID35450087
PMCPMC9016593
OpenAlexW4225692569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.