Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35450079›Full record

ArticleWater2022

Development of a Risk Characterization Tool for Harmful Cyanobacteria Blooms on the Ohio River.

Christopher T Nietch, Leslie Gains-Germain, James Lazorchak, Scott P Keely, Gregory Youngstrom, Emilee M Urichich, Brian Astifan, Abram DaSilva, Heather Mayfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Water, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluating Causal Links Between ChlorophyllEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christopher T NietchUSEPA Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 26 Martin Luther King Dr W, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6265-7070
Leslie Gains-GermainNeptune and Company, Inc., 1435 Garrison Street, Suite 201, Lakewood, CO 80215, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4493-9012
James LazorchakUSEPA Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 26 Martin Luther King Dr W, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7354-7571
Scott P KeelyUSEPA Office of Research and Development, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, 26 Martin Luther King Dr W, Cincinnati, OH 45268, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5343-3649
Gregory YoungstromOhio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission, 5735 Kellogg Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45230, USA.
Emilee M UrichichOhio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission, 5735 Kellogg Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45230, USA.
Brian AstifanNational Weather Service, Ohio River Forecast Center, 1901 South State Route 134, Wilmington, OH 45177, USA.
Abram DaSilvaNational Weather Service, Ohio River Forecast Center, 1901 South State Route 134, Wilmington, OH 45177, USA.
Heather MayfieldFoundation for Ohio River Education, Ohio River Valley Water Sanitation Commission, 5735 Kellogg Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45230, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A data-driven approach to characterizing the risk of cyanobacteria-based harmful algal blooms (cyanoHABs) was undertaken for the Ohio River. Twenty-five years of river discharge data were used to develop Bayesian regression models that are currently applicable to 20 sites spread-out along the entire 1579 km of the river's length. Two site-level prediction models were developed based on the antecedent flow conditions of the two blooms that occurred on the river in 2015 and 2019: one predicts if the current year will have a bloom (the occurrence model), and another predicts bloom persistence (the persistence model). Predictors for both models were based on time-lagged average flow exceedances and a site's characteristic residence time under low flow conditions. Model results are presented in terms of probabilities of occurrence or persistence with uncertainty. Although the occurrence of the 2019 bloom was well predicted with the modeling approach, the limited number of events constrained formal model validation. However, as a measure of performance, leave-one-out cross validation returned low misclassification rates, suggesting that future years with flow time series like the previous bloom years will be correctly predicted and characterized for persistence potential. The prediction probabilities are served in real time as a component of a risk characterization tool/web application. In addition to presenting the model's results, the tool was designed with visualization options for studying water quality trends among eight river sites currently collecting data that could be associated with or indicative of bloom conditions. The tool is made accessible to river water quality professionals to support risk communication to stakeholders, as well as serving as a real-time water data monitoring utility.

Indexed as

big rivercyanobacteriaharmful algae bloompredictive modelingrisk characterization

Identifiers

PMID35450079
PMCPMC9019831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.