Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449991›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2022

Vocal fold injury models in rats: a literature review on techniques and methodology.

Peter Laszlo Ujvary, Cristina Maria Blebea, Alma Aurelia Maniu, Sever Pop, Orsolya Sarpataki, Marcel Cosgarea

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter Laszlo UjvaryDepartment of Otolaryngology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Cristina Maria BlebeaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alma Aurelia ManiuDepartment of Otolaryngology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Sever PopDepartment of Otolaryngology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Orsolya SarpatakiDepartment of Physiology, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Marcel CosgareaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROUniversity of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine of Cluj-Napoca · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reviewed the current literature on technical aspects regarding controlled vocal fold injuries in the rat model. Data from PubMed, Embase, and Scopus database for English language literature was collected to identify methodological steps leading to a controlled surgical injury of the rat vocal fold. Inclusion criteria: full disclosure of anesthesia protocol, positioning of the rat for surgery, vocal fold visualization method, instrumentation for vocal fold injury, vocal fold injury type. Articles with partial contribution were evaluated and separately included due to the limited number of original methodologies. 724 articles were screened, and eleven articles were included in the analysis. Anesthesia: ketamine hydrochloride and xylazine hydrochloride varied in dose from 45 mg/kg and 4.5 mg/kg to 100 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg. Visualization: The preferred method was the 1.9 mm, 25-30 degree endoscopes. The widest diameter endoscope used was 2.7 mm with a 0 or 30 degree angle of view. Instruments for lesion induction range from 18 to 31G needles, microscissors, micro forceps to potassium titanyl phosphate, and blue light lasers. Injury types: vocal fold stripping was the main injury type, followed by vocal fold scarring and charring. One article describes scaffold implantation with injury to the superior aspect of the vocal fold. Rats are good candidates for in vivo larynx and vocal folds research. A more standardized approach should be considered regarding the type of vocal fold injury to ease data comparison.

Indexed as

LarynxVocal CordsAnimalsCicatrixHumansRatsinjurymethodologyratreviewvocal fold

Identifiers

PMID35449991
PMCPMC9015177
OpenAlexW4224318949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.