ArticleACS omega2022
Growth-Associated Droplet Shrinkage for Bacterial Quantification, Growth Monitoring, and Separation by Ultrahigh-Throughput Microfluidics.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic droplet cultivation preserves microalgae diversity in screening systems.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Bacterial Proteomics and Antibiotic Resistance Identification: Is Single-Cell Analysis a Worthwhile Pursuit?Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- SAM-dPCR: Accurate and Generalist Nuclei Acid Quantification Leveraging the Zero-Shot Segment Anything Model.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Recent advances in microfluidic-based spectroscopic approaches for pathogen detection.Biomicrofluidics · 2024Review
- The use of droplet-based microfluidic technologies for accelerated selection ofBiology methods & protocols · 2024Review
- Droplet Detection and Sorting System in Microfluidics: A Review.Micromachines · 2022Review
- The Effect of Bacteria on the Stability of Microfluidic-Generated Water-in-Oil Droplet.Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microbiology still relies on en masse cultivation for selection, isolation, and characterization of microorganisms of interest. This constrains the diversity of microbial types and metabolisms that can be investigated in the laboratory also because of intercellular competition during cultivation. Cell individualization by droplet-based microfluidics prior to experimental analysis provides an attractive alternative to access a larger fraction of the microbial biosphere, miniaturizing the required equipment and minimizing reagent use for increased and more efficient analytical throughput. Here, we show that cultivation of a model two-strain bacterial community in droplets significantly reduces representation bias in the grown culture compared to batch cultivation. Further, and based on the droplet shrinkage observed upon cell proliferation, we provide proof-of-concept for a simple strategy that allows absolute quantification of microbial cells in a sample as well as selective recovery of microorganisms of interest for subsequent experimental characterization.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.