Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449922›Full record

ArticleACS omega2022

Deep Neural Network-Assisted Drug Recommendation Systems for Identifying Potential Drug-Target Interactions.

Yogesh Kalakoti, Shashank Yadav, Durai Sundar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Explainable Artificial Intelligence in the Field of Drug Research.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yogesh KalakotiDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110 016, India.
Shashank YadavDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110 016, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5741-3215
Durai SundarDAILAB, Department of Biochemical Engineering & Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Delhi, New Delhi 110 016, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6549-6663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In silico methods to identify novel drug-target interactions (DTIs) have gained significant importance over conventional techniques owing to their labor-intensive and low-throughput nature. Here, we present a machine learning-based multiclass classification workflow that segregates interactions between active, inactive, and intermediate drug-target pairs. Drug molecules, protein sequences, and molecular descriptors were transformed into machine-interpretable embeddings to extract critical features from standard datasets. Tools such as CHEMBL web resource, iFeature, and an in-house developed deep neural network-assisted drug recommendation (dNNDR)-featx were employed for data retrieval and processing. The models were trained with large-scale DTI datasets, which reported an improvement in performance over baseline methods. External validation results showed that models based on att-biLSTM and gCNN could help predict novel DTIs. When tested with a completely different dataset, the proposed models significantly outperformed competing methods. The validity of novel interactions predicted by dNNDR was backed by experimental and computational evidence in the literature. The proposed methodology could elucidate critical features that govern the relationship between a drug and its target.

Identifiers

PMID35449922
PMCPMC9016825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.