Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449883›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of arrhythmia2022

Machine learning techniques for arrhythmic risk stratification: a review of the literature.

Cheuk To Chung, George Bazoukis, Sharen Lee, Ying Liu, Tong Liu, Konstantinos P Letsas, Antonis A Armoundas, Gary Tse

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of arrhythmia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Cheuk To ChungCardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, China-UK Collaboration, Hong Kong, China.
George BazoukisDepartment of Cardiology, Larnaca General Hospital, Larnaca, Cyprus.
Sharen LeeCardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, China-UK Collaboration, Hong Kong, China.
Ying LiuHeart Failure and Structural Cardiology Ward, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning Province, China.
Tong LiuTianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300211, China.
Konstantinos P LetsasDepartment of Electrophysiology, Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center, Athens, Greece.
Antonis A ArmoundasCardiovascular Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, Boston, MA 02129, USA.
Gary TseCardiac Electrophysiology Unit, Cardiovascular Analytics Group, China-UK Collaboration, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5510-1253
Dalian Medical University · CNMassachusetts General Hospital · USMedway School of Pharmacy · GBOnassis Cardiac Surgery Center · GRSecond Hospital of Tianjin Medical University · CNUniversity of Nicosia · CY

Funding

Prevention and Treatment of Ventricular TachyarrhythmiasR01HL135335 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARMOUNDAS, ANTONIS A · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
A Medical-Grade Smart-Phone Based Monitoring System (Supplement)R21EB026164 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARMOUNDAS, ANTONIS A · 2018 to 2020
$668k
Utility of Vagal Stimulation to Prevent the Onset of Ventricular ArrhythmiasR21HL137870 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ARMOUNDAS, ANTONIS A · 2017 to 2018
$468k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL135335NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL137870NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB026164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are significant adverse events that affect the morbidity and mortality of both the general population and patients with predisposing cardiovascular risk factors. Currently, conventional disease-specific scores are used for risk stratification purposes. However, these risk scores have several limitations, including variations among validation cohorts, the inclusion of a limited number of predictors while omitting important variables, as well as hidden relationships between predictors. Machine learning (ML) techniques are based on algorithms that describe intervariable relationships. Recent studies have implemented ML techniques to construct models for the prediction of fatal VAs. However, the application of ML study findings is limited by the absence of established frameworks for its implementation, in addition to clinicians' unfamiliarity with ML techniques. This review, therefore, aims to provide an accessible and easy-to-understand summary of the existing evidence about the use of ML techniques in the prediction of VAs. Our findings suggest that ML algorithms improve arrhythmic prediction performance in different clinical settings. However, it should be emphasized that prospective studies comparing ML algorithms to conventional risk models are needed while a regulatory framework is required prior to their implementation in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceMachine learningPrediction modelsRisk stratificationVentricular arrhythmiasVentricular fibrillationVentricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID35449883
PMCPMC9020640
OpenAlexW4220724116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.