ReviewmHealth2022
Key observations in terms of management of electronic health records from a mHealth perspective.
Review in mHealth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence, Electronic Health Records, and Wearables for Predictive, Patient-Centered Decision Support in Healthcare.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- mHealth on the periphery.mHealth · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The article is a narrative review that briefly describes some of the recent advances in healthcare data management that will have positive effect on mHealth. The advances described in this article are in fact innovation introduced by the author to the field of data management with respect to electronic health records. The research delineated is transdisciplinary in nature and will potentially have positive impact on healthcare outcomes. Also, the article illustrates the necessity for an out of the box thinking approach to improve mHealth while discussing the current impending issues related to data incompleteness of electronic health records and the much-needed decision support systems for mHealth. It is to be noted that most of the electronic health records are now accessed by patients through mobile devices. These mobile devices will run as clients while much of the heavy computing is performed using servers. Here it is important to discuss some of the important technologies and methods used for decision making. The article attempts to present a discussion on how this myriad of intertwining technologies support this decision making with respect to electronic health records. More importantly it is these processes that assist in decision making and efficiency for both mHealth users and providers. In this respect, the article first provides insights on the complexities of decision making involved with electronic health records. This is followed by a discussion on the problem of data incompleteness of electronic health records. Finally, the author provides some insights into the gravity of the problem of data incompleteness in terms of revenue loss/gain for healthcare providers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.