Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449458›Full record

ReviewNature ecology & evolution2022

Potential negative effects of ocean afforestation on offshore ecosystems.

Philip W Boyd, Lennart T Bach, Catriona L Hurd, Ellie Paine, John A Raven, Veronica Tamsitt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature ecology & evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Philip W BoydInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia. Philip.boyd@utas.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7850-1911
Lennart T BachInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0202-3671
Catriona L HurdInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Ellie PaineInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
John A RavenDivision of Plant Sciences, University of Dundee at the James Hutton Institute, Dundee, UK.
Veronica TamsittCollege of Marine Science, University of South Florida, St Petersburg, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our scientific understanding of climate change makes clear the necessity for both emission reduction and carbon dioxide removal (CDR). The ocean with its large surface area, great depths and long coastlines is central to developing CDR approaches commensurate with the scale needed to limit warming to below 2 °C. Many proposed marine CDR approaches rely on spatial upscaling along with enhancement and/or acceleration of the rates of naturally occurring processes. One such approach is 'ocean afforestation', which involves offshore transport and concurrent growth of nearshore macroalgae (seaweed), followed by their export into the deep ocean. The purposeful occupation for months of open ocean waters by macroalgae, which do not naturally occur there, will probably affect offshore ecosystems through a range of biological threats, including altered ocean chemistry and changed microbial physiology and ecology. Here, we present model simulations of ocean afforestation and link these to lessons from other examples of offshore dispersal, including rafting plastic debris, and discuss the ramifications for offshore ecosystems. We explore what additional metrics are required to assess the ecological implications of this proposed CDR. In our opinion, these ecological metrics must have equal weight to CDR capacity in the development of initial trials, pilot studies and potential licensing.

Indexed as

EcosystemSeaweedCarbon DioxideClimate ChangeOceans and SeasCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID35449458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.