Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449434›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Social capital's impact on COVID-19 outcomes at local levels.

Timothy Fraser, Courtney Page-Tan, Daniel P Aldrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. What Makes Urban Communities More Resilient to COVID-19? A Systematic Review of Current Evidence.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mapping the Vulnerability of Older-Adult Neighborhoods: An Ecological Study of New York State.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Timothy FraserPolitical Science Department, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. timothy.fraser.1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4509-0244
Courtney Page-TanSecurity and Emergency Services Department, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, 32114, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-3484
Daniel P AldrichSecurity and Resilience Program, Department of Political Science, School of Public Policy & Urban Affairs, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4150-995X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past thirty years, disaster scholars have highlighted that communities with stronger social infrastructure-including social ties that enable trust, mutual aid, and collective action-tend to respond to and recover better from crises. However, comprehensive measurements of social capital across communities have been rare. This study adapts Kyne and Aldrich's (Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 11, 61-86, 2020) county-level social capital index to the census-tract level, generating social capital indices from 2011 to 2018 at the census-tract, zipcode, and county subdivision levels. To demonstrate their usefulness to disaster planners, public health experts, and local officials, we paired these with the CDC's Social Vulnerability Index to predict the incidence of COVID-19 in case studies in Massachusetts, Wisconsin, Illinois, and New York City. We found that social capital predicted 41-49% of the variation in COVID-19 outbreaks, and up to 90% with controls in specific cases, highlighting its power as diagnostic and predictive tools for combating the spread of COVID.

Indexed as

COVID-19DisastersSocial CapitalHumansIncidenceNew York City

Identifiers

PMID35449434
PMCPMC9022050

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.