Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449392›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2023

Simultaneous learning of directional and non-directional stimulus relations in baboons (Papio papio).

Thomas F Chartier, Joël Fagot

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the generality of behavioral theory and abstract phenomena.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas F ChartierLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, UMR 7290, Bâtiment 9 Case D, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, Cedex 3, France. thomas.chartier.08@m4x.org.
Joël FagotLaboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive, CNRS and Aix-Marseille Université, UMR 7290, Bâtiment 9 Case D, 3 place Victor Hugo, 13331, Marseille, Cedex 3, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While humans exposed to a sequential stimulus pairing A-B are commonly assumed to form a bidirectional mental relation between A and B, evidence that non-human animals can do so is limited. Careful examination of the animal literature suggests possible improvements in the test procedures used to probe such effects, notably measuring transfer effects on the learning of B-A pairings, rather than direct recall of A upon cuing with B. We developed such an experimental design and tested 20 Guinea baboons (Papio papio). Two pairings of visual shapes were trained (A1-B1, A2-B2) and testing was conducted in a reversed order, either with conserved pairings (B1-A1, B2-A2) or broken ones (B1-A2, B2-A1). We found baboons' immediate test performance to be above chance level for conserved pairings and below chance level for broken ones. Moreover, baboons needed less trials to learn conserved pairings compared to broken ones. These effects were apparent for both pairings on average, and separately for the best learned pairing. Baboons' responding on B-A trials was thus influenced by their previous A-B training. Performance level at the onset of testing, however, suggests that baboons did not respond in full accordance with the hypothesis of bidirectionality. To account for these data, we suggest that two competing types of relations were concomitantly encoded: a directional relation between A and B, which retains the sequential order experienced, and a non-directional relation, which retains only the co-occurrence of events, not their temporal order.

Indexed as

Papio papioAnimalsCuesLearningPapioResearch DesignAssociative symmetryBaboonsDirectionalityPrimate cognitionStimulus equivalence

Identifiers

PMID35449392
PMCPMC10272242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.