ArticleScientific reports2022
Changes in contrast sensitivity after surgery for intermittent exotropia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Realignment Reverses Contrast Sensitivity Deficits in Children With Intermittent Exotropia: One-Year Results of a Cohort Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Validity of digital measurement of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in Parkinson's disease.BMC digital health · 2025Article
- Binocular Summation With Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function: A Novel Parameter to Evaluate Binocular Function in Intermittent Exotropia.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Binocular summation of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity in children with intermittent exotropia.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To determine whether intermittent exotropia (IXT) surgery affects contrast sensitivity (CS), this retrospective study evaluated the changes in monocular and binocular CS and the binocular summation ratio (BSR) quantified as the ratio between the values of the binocular and the better monocular CS score (BSR = binocular CS score/better monocular CS score) after surgery for IXT. The subjects were patients who had undergone IXT-correcting surgery with a postoperative follow-up of > 3 months and had pre- and postoperative records of Mars CS test scores. In total, 64 patients (128 eyes) were evaluated. Both the binocular and monocular CS scores of the operated eyes were significantly worse on postoperative 1 day than the preoperative scores, but they were recovered after 1 week. The monocular CS scores of the operated eyes were significantly worse than those of the non-operated eyes until 1 week. There was no significant difference in monocular CS scores between the one-muscle and two-muscle surgeries and in binocular CS scores between the successful alignment and overcorrection groups even on the first day after surgery. The mean BSR was significantly decreased until postoperative month 1, however, recovered to preoperative levels after month 3. In conclusion, IXT-correcting surgery may temporarily worsen the CS, but it is recovered to preoperative levels. Thus, changes in CS in the immediate postoperative period after strabismus surgery should not be of concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.