Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449118›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2022

Provision of safe patient care during the COVID-19 pandemic despite shared patient rooms in a tertiary hospital.

Astrid Füszl, Lukas Bouvier-Azula, Miriam Van den Nest, Julia Ebner, Robert Strassl, Cornelia Gabler, Magda Diab-Elschahawi, Elisabeth Presterl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Astrid Füszl *Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Lukas Bouvier-Azula *Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Miriam Van den NestDepartment of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Julia EbnerDepartment of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Robert StrasslDepartment of Laboratory Medicine (Division of Clinical Virology), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Cornelia GablerResearch, Documentation and Analysis (RDA), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Magda Diab-ElschahawiDepartment of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. magda.diab-elschahawi@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID 0000-0001-9765-9239
Elisabeth PresterlDepartment of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in the disruption of healthcare systems. Vienna General Hospital (VGH), a tertiary hospital located in Austria, ran at almost full capacity despite high levels of community SARS-CoV-2 transmission and limited isolation room capacity. To ensure safe patient care, a bundle of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures including universal pre-admission screening and serial SARS-CoV-2 testing during hospitalization was implemented. We evaluated whether testing as part of our IPC approach was effective in preventing hospital outbreaks during different stages of the pandemic.

methodsIn this retrospective single center study, we analyzed the SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results of cases admitted to VGH between a low (15/05/2020-01/08/2020) and a high incidence period (15/09/2020-18/05/2021). Outcomes were the diagnostic yield of (a) admission screening, (b) the yield of serial testing during hospitalization and (c) the occurrence of healthcare-associated COVID-19 (HA-COVID-19) and SARS-CoV-2 related hospital outbreaks.

resultsThe admission test positivity rate was 0.2% during the low and 2.3% during the high incidence phase. Regarding test conversions, 0.04% (low incidence phase) and 0.5% (high incidence phase) of initially negative cases converted to a positive test result within 7 days after admission The HA-COVID-19 incidence rate per 100,000 patient days was 1.0 (low incidence phase) and 10.7 (high incidence phase). One COVID-19 outbreak affecting eight patients in total could be potentially ascribed to the non-compliance with our IPC protocol.

conclusionTesting in conjunction with other IPC measures enabled the safe provision of patient care at a hospital with predominantly shared patient rooms despite high case numbers in the community.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHospitalizationHumansPandemicsPatients' RoomsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tertiary Care CentersCOVID-19Healthcare-associated COVID-19Infection prevention and controlNosocomial outbreakTesting strategyUniversal screening

Identifiers

PMID35449118
PMCPMC9021561
OpenAlexW4224239898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.