ArticleBMC medical education2022
Key stakeholders' views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement in healthcare professions' education: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Public participation in healthcare students' education: An umbrella review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- Public Involvement in the Evaluation of Local Government Public Health Interventions in the UK: Lessons From PHIRST Insight.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Service user involvement in the education of allied healthcare professionals in Ireland: a mixed-methods exploration.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Poor Knowledge and Suboptimal Practice Regarding Postmenopausal Osteoporosis Prevention Among Chinese Postmenopausal Women: A Structural Equation Model Analysis.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- "I've Never Really Thought about This…" - The Complexity of Patient Involvement in Education from the Teachers' Point of View.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- A Checklist for Involving Patients in Educational Activities.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- How to Co-Create Online Continuing Professional Development With People With Lived and Living Experience.The clinical teacher · 2025Article
- Engaging Adolescents With Chronic Illness in Patient-Education: The Adolescent's Perception.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Article
- The pedagogical liminality of patient and public involvement in initial healthcare professional education: an umbrella review.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Review
- Exploring what works in mental health education for health profession students: a realist review.BMC medical education · 2025Review
- Exploring the Integration of Patient Perspectives in Surgeon Education: Awareness, Engagement and Barriers to Implementation.Journal of CME · 2025Article
- Exploring the Transformative Potential of Learning Analytics in Medical Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2025Review
- Practical Recommendations for Navigating Digital Tools in Hospitals: Qualitative Interview Study.JMIR medical education · 2024Article
- Incorporating Community Member Perspectives to Inform a Resident Health Equity Curriculum.Journal of graduate medical education · 2023Article
- Transforming the Medical School Admissions Process: Prioritizing Team-Based Skills and Patient-Centered Values.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients and the public have an integral role in educating healthcare professionals. Authentic partnerships between higher education institutions and patients and the public are essential. This study examined key stakeholders' views, experiences and expectations of patient and public involvement (PPI) including the nature of the involvement and requirements for partnership.
methodsPurposive and snowball sampling was used to recruit key stakeholders, including patients and members of the public involved in health professions education, and academics interested in PPI. Focus groups were held with patient and public participants, providing the opportunity to gain multiple perspectives in an interactive group setting. Academics with an interest in PPI were interviewed using a semi-structured approach. Topic guides were derived from the literature and piloted prior to data collection. Focus groups and interviews were conducted until data saturation was achieved. All data was audio-recorded, transcribed, anonymised and thematically analysed.
resultsFour focus groups were conducted involving 23 patient and public participants (median number of participants per focus group of 6). Nine interviews were conducted with academics (face-to-face [n = 8] or by telephone [n = 1]). Five themes were developed: previous experiences of PPI, training requirements, challenges/barriers to PPI, facilitators of PPI and future ideas for PPI. All participants held positive views of the value of PPI. Participants had mixed views in terms of training, which depended on the level of involvement, but similar views on the challenges and facilitators for PPI in education. There was agreement that PPI requires institutional vision and investment to build strong relationships and a culture of PPI best practice.
conclusionsThere is a need for more strategic and formal involvement of patients and the public to ensure that that PPI becomes sustainably embedded in health professions education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.