Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449097›Full record

Trial reportBMC surgery2022

Comparison of post-operative bleeding incidence in laser hemorrhoidoplasty with and without hemorrhoidal artery ligation: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.

Shu Yu Lim, Retnagowri Rajandram, April Camilla Roslani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04667169 (Comparison of Post-operative Bleeding Incidence in Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty Versus Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty With Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04667169 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison of Post-operative Bleeding Incidence in Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty Versus Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty With Haemorrhoidal Artery Ligation: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2015 to 2018Enrolled76ConditionsHemorrhoidsArmsHaemorrhoidal Artery Ligation, Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shu Yu LimDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Retnagowri RajandramDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
April Camilla RoslaniDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, 50603, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. april@ummc.edu.my.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2458-965X
University of Malaya · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe effectiveness of hemorrhoidal artery ligation supplementation in reducing the incidence of post laser hemorrhoidoplasty bleeding has not been investigated.

methodsThis was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing post-operative bleeding incidence in patients undergoing laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LHP) only versus LHP with hemorrhoidal artery ligation (HAL). Outcome measures included post-operative bleeding and its severity (i.e. verbal rating scale and Clavien-Dindo classification), presence of perianal swelling and pain score (visual analog score) at 1-day, 1-week and 6-weeks post-operatively. Statistical tests were performed and a value of P < 0.05 was considered significant.

resultsSeventy-six patients were randomized. There was no difference in median operating time. The bleeding incidence was highest at 1-week post-operatively (17.1%), and decreased to 1.3% at 6-weeks. There was no significant difference in bleeding incidence between both groups at any of the measured timepoints (P > 0.05). Severity of bleeding and incidence of post-operative perianal swelling were similar in both groups (P > 0.05). There was no difference in median pain scores.

conclusionSupplementation of HAL to LHP does not reduce the post-operative bleeding incidence. LHP is sufficient as a stand-alone procedure for treating haemorrhoids.

trial registrationNational Registration Number is NMRR-15-1112-24065 (IIR). The trial start date was 1st January 2015 with the ClinicalTrials.gov identifier and registration number as NCT04667169.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidsArteriesHumansIncidenceLasersLigationPainPostoperative HemorrhagePostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeColorectal surgeryHemorrhoidal artery ligationHemorrhoidectomyHemorrhoidsLaser hemorrhoidoplasty

Identifiers

PMID35449097
PMCPMC9022276
OpenAlexW4225624175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.