Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449095›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2022

"You have a self-testing method that preserves privacy so how come you cannot give us treatment that does too?" Exploring the reasoning among young people about linkage to prevention, care and treatment after HIV self-testing in Southern Malawi.

Lisa Harrison, Moses Kumwenda, Lot Nyirenda, Richard Chilongosi, Elizabeth Corbett, Karin Hatzold, Cheryl Johnson, Musonda Simwinga, Nicola Desmond, Miriam Taegtmeyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa HarrisonDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. lisaharrisonwk@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-3975
Moses KumwendaMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Lot NyirendaSchool of Public Health and Family Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre, Malawi.
Richard ChilongosiDepartment of HIV Prevention, Population Services International, Blantyre, Malawi.
Elizabeth CorbettMalawi Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Cheryl JohnsonDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STIs Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Musonda SimwingaZambia AIDS Related Tuberculosis Project, Lusaka, Zambia.
Nicola DesmondDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundYoung people, aged 16-24, in southern Malawi have high uptake of HIV self-testing (HIVST) but low rates of linking to services following HIVST, especially in comparison, to older generations. The study aim is to explore the barriers and facilitators to linkage for HIV prevention and care following uptake of HIV self-testing among young Malawians.

methodsWe used qualitative methods. Young people aged 16-24 who had received HIVST; community-based distribution agents (CBDAs) and health care workers from the linked facilities were purposively sampled from two villages in rural southern Malawi.

resultsWe conducted in-depth interviews with thirteen young people (9 female) and held four focus groups with 28 healthcare workers and CBDAs. Young people strongly felt the social consequences associated with inadvertent disclosure of HIV sero-status were a significant deterrent to linkage at their stage in life. They also felt communication on testing benefits and the referral process after testing was poor. In contrast, they valued encouragement from those they trusted, other's positive treatment experiences and having a "strength of mind". CBDAs were important facilitators for young people as they are able to foster a trusting relationship and had more understanding of the factors which prevented young people from linking following HIVST than the healthcare workers. Young people noted contextual barriers to linkage, for example, being seen on the road to the healthcare centre, but also societal gendered barriers. For example, young females and younger adolescents were less likely to have the financial independence to link to services whilst young males (aged 19-24) had the finances but lacked a supportive network to encourage linkage following testing. Overall, it was felt that the primary "responsibility" for linking to formal healthcare following self-testing is shouldered by the young person and not the healthcare system.

conclusionsYoung people are happy to self-test for HIV but faced barriers to link to services following a self-test. Potential interventions for improving linkage suggested by this analysis include the establishment of youth-friendly linkage services, enhanced lines of communication between young people and healthcare providers and prioritising linkage for future interventions when targeting young people following HIVST.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-TestingAdolescentFemaleHIV TestingHumansMalawiMaleMass ScreeningPrivacyAdolescentsCommunity-based healthHIV self-testingLinkageMalawiYoung people

Identifiers

PMID35449095
PMCPMC9026576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.