Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449059›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2022

Ultrasound localization of central vein catheter tip by contrast-enhanced transthoracic ultrasonography: a comparison study with trans-esophageal echocardiography.

Francesco Corradi, Fabio Guarracino, Gregorio Santori, Claudia Brusasco, Guido Tavazzi, Gabriele Via, Silvia Mongodi, Francesco Mojoli, Raffaello Umberto Dario Biagini, Alessandro Isirdi and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Central venous catheterization: the cephalic vein access.Critical care (London, England) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Venous access devices (Review).Medicine international
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Francesco CorradiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. francesco.corradi@unipi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5588-2608
Fabio GuarracinoDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2562-0199
Gregorio SantoriDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3764-2624
Claudia BrusascoAnesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6709-6172
Guido TavazziDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9560-5138
Gabriele ViaCardiac Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6278-0506
Silvia MongodiAnaesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1987-8599
Francesco MojoliDepartment of Clinical Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6031-6336
Raffaello Umberto Dario BiaginiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro IsirdiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Federico DazziDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara RobbaDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1628-3845
Luigi VetrugnoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3745-8368
Francesco ForforiDepartment of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8201-8076
UCARE research group
University of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITEnte Ospedaliero Ospedali Galliera · ITEpatocentro Ticino · CHPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Chieti-Pescara · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the usefulness of pre-operative contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (CE-TTE) and post-operative chest-x-ray (CXR) for evaluating central venous catheter (CVC) tip placements, with trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) as gold standard.

methodsA prospective single-center, observational study was performed in 111 patients requiring CVC positioning into the internal jugular vein for elective cardiac surgery. At the end of CVC insertion by landmark technique, a contrast-enhanced TTE was performed by both the apical four-chambers and epigastric bicaval acoustic view to assess catheter tip position; then, a TEE was performed and considered as a reference technique. A postoperative CXR was obtained for all patients.

resultsAs per TEE, 74 (67%) catheter tips were correctly placed and 37 (33%) misplaced. Considering intravascular and intracardiac misplacements together, they were detected in 8 patients by CE-TTE via apical four-chamber view, 36 patients by CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view, and 12 patients by CXR. For the detection of catheter tip misplacement, CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view was the most accurate method providing 97% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 92% diagnostic accuracy if compared with either CE-TTE via apical four-chamber view or CXR. Concordance with TEE was 79% (p < 0.001) for CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view.

conclusionsThe concordance between CE-TTE via epigastric bicaval acoustic view and TEE suggests the use of the former as a standard technique to ensure the correct positioning of catheter tip after central venous cannulation to optimize the use of hospital resources and minimize radiation exposure.

Indexed as

Catheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersEchocardiographyEchocardiography, TransesophagealHumansProspective StudiesUltrasonography, InterventionalBubble testCardiac surgery patientsCentral venous catheterizationChest radiographyCVC misplacementsInternal jugular vein cannulation

Identifiers

PMID35449059
PMCPMC9027702
OpenAlexW4224271707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.