Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449055›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Improved intention, self-efficacy and social influence in the workspace may help low vision service workers to discuss depression and anxiety with visually impaired and blind adults.

Edine P J van Munster, Hilde P A van der Aa, Peter Verstraten, Martijn W Heymans, Ruth M A van Nispen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Feasibility and potential effectiveness of the IdentifEYE training programmes to address mental health problems in adults with vision impairment.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Edine P J van MunsterAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Ophthalmology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. e.vanmunster@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9250-055X
Hilde P A van der AaAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Ophthalmology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter VerstratenRobert Coppes Foundation, Expertise, Innovation and Knowledge, Vlasmeersestraat 38-A, Vught, the Netherlands.
Martijn W HeymansAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Epidemiology and Data Science, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ruth M A van NispenAmsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Ophthalmology, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLKnowledge Foundation · SELighthouse Guild · US

Funding

Program Council Visual Sector, the Netherlands VJ2018-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression and anxiety are common in visually impaired and blind adults, but often remain untreated in those who receive support from low vision service (LVS) organizations. This study aims to determine factors associated with discussing mental health by LVS workers.

methodsA self-administered cross-sectional survey in one hundred LVS workers was performed. Data on current practice, symptom attribution, and determinants of the Integrated Change Model (i.e. predisposing and environmental factors, awareness, attitude, self-efficacy, social influence, confidence and barriers) were investigated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine predictors of discussing mental health problems in this population. Subsequently, internal validation was conducted using a bootstrapping method.

resultsAround 80% of the participants often discussed mental health with clients. Five factors were found to predict discussion of mental health: female gender (OR = 4.51; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98 to 21.61), higher education (OR = 3.39; CI 1.19 to 9.66), intention to discuss mental health problems (OR = 3.49; CI 1.20 to 10.15), higher self-efficacy (OR = 1.11; CI 1.02 to 1.20), and higher perceived social influence (OR = 1.15; CI 1.05 to 1.27). Good discrimination after internal validation was reflected by the area under the curve (0.850).

conclusionsPrevious studies indicate clients want healthcare providers to initiate discussions about mental health. However, still 20% of LVS workers do not discuss suspected depression or anxiety. In order to improve this, LVS organizations could address mental health as part of their care and provide training to ensure intention to discuss mental health problems, improve self-efficacy and create a supportive environment between colleagues.

Indexed as

DepressionVision, LowAdultAnxietyBlindnessCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntentionSelf EfficacyAnxietyDepressionDetectionLow visionProfessional developmentVision impairment

Identifiers

PMID35449055
PMCPMC9027071
OpenAlexW4224215323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.