Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35449022›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Old zoonotic agents and novel variants of tick-borne microorganisms from Benguela (Angola), July 2017.

Ana M Palomar, Israel Molina, Cristina Bocanegra, Aránzazu Portillo, Fernando Salvador, Milagros Moreno, José A Oteo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ticks From Mink and Their Associated Microorganisms in Spain.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Distribution and Prevalence ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Review
  10. First report of spotted fever groupFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ana M Palomar *Infectious Diseases Department, Center of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases (CRETAV), San Pedro University Hospital-Center of Biomedical Research From La Rioja (CIBIR), Piqueras, 98, 26006, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Israel Molina *Infectious Diseases Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina BocanegraInfectious Diseases Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Aránzazu PortilloInfectious Diseases Department, Center of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases (CRETAV), San Pedro University Hospital-Center of Biomedical Research From La Rioja (CIBIR), Piqueras, 98, 26006, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain.
Fernando SalvadorInfectious Diseases Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, PROSICS Barcelona, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
Milagros MorenoHospital Nossa Senhora da Paz, Cubal, Angola.
José A OteoInfectious Diseases Department, Center of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-Borne Diseases (CRETAV), San Pedro University Hospital-Center of Biomedical Research From La Rioja (CIBIR), Piqueras, 98, 26006, Logroño, La Rioja, Spain. jaoteo@riojasalud.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7080-6542

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicks and tick-borne diseases constitute a real threat for the livestock industry, which is increasing in Angola. In addition, ticks are vectors of zoonoses of public health concern, and scarce information is available from this country. In an effort to contribute to the prevention of zoonotic infectious diseases affecting humans and animals, the molecular screening of certain tick-related microorganisms collected on cattle in Angola was performed under a 'One Health' scope.

methodsTicks collected from cattle in Cubal (Benguela Province, Angola) in July 2017 were analysed in pools using specific PCR assays for bacteria (Rickettsia, Anaplasmataceae, Borrelia, Coxiella and Spiroplasma) and protozoa (Theileria and Babesia) detection.

resultsA total of 124 tick specimens were grouped in 25 pools (two Amblyomma variegatum, three Hyalomma truncatum, 16 Rhipicephalus decoloratus, two Rhipicephalus duttoni, one Rhipicephalus evertsi mimeticus and one Rhipicephalus sp.). The amplified microorganisms were (pools): Rickettsia africae (two A. variegatum and one R. decoloratus), Rickettsia aeschlimannii (three H. truncatum), Ehrlichia spp. (six R. decoloratus), Coxiella spp. (all but H. truncatum), Francisella sp. (one H. truncatum), Spiroplasma sp. closely related to Spiroplasma ixodetis (three R. decoloratus), Babesia bigemina (two R. decoloratus) and Babesia spp. (two A. variegatum). The obtained nucleotide sequences from Ehrlichia spp., two Coxiella genotypes (from R. duttoni and Rhipicephalus sp.), Francisella sp. and Babesia spp. (from A. variegatum) reached low identities with known genetically characterized species.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates the circulation in Angola of the pathogen R. aeschlimannii and potential novel tick-related microorganisms belonging to Ehrlichia, Coxiella, Francisella, Spiroplasma and Babesia spp. and corroborates the presence of R. africae and B. bigemina. Our results should be considered in developing protocols for the management of fever of unknown origin and for veterinary practices. Further studies are required to evaluate the risk of tick-borne diseases in Angola.

Indexed as

BabesiaCattle DiseasesRhipicephalusRickettsiaTick-Borne DiseasesTick InfestationsAngolaAnimalsCattleCoxiellaEhrlichiaZoonosesAnaplasmataceaeAngolaBabesiaBorreliaCoxiellaRickettsiaSpiroplasmaTick-borne microorganismsTicksZoonotic agents

Identifiers

PMID35449022
PMCPMC9022410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.