ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2022
The KIDSCREEN-27 scale: translation and validation study of the Slovenian version.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07313267 (Effectiveness of an Intervention Programme Using Alternative Sports for the Recovery of Motor Learning and the Improvement of Physical and Mental Health in Primary School Students.), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of an Intervention Programme Using Alternative Sports for the Recovery of Motor Learning and the Improvement of Physical and Mental Health in Primary School Students.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- ADHD Symptoms in Parents of Children With or Without ADHD: Prospective Association With Children's Quality of Life and Emotional and Conduct Problems (EPINED Cohort).Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2026Article
- Mediating Effects of Family and Clinical Characteristics on the Quality of Life of Children With Spina Bifida and Their Parents.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Enabling six- to ten-year-old children to self-report their wellbeing and quality of life: development and psychometric investigation of an age-adapted and video-assisted version of the KIDSCREEN-27.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Enhancing Adolescent Physical Fitness and Well-Being: A School-Based High-Intensity Interval Training Program.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- School children's mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are many methods available for measuring social support and quality of life (QoL) of adolescents, of these, the KIDSCREEN tools are most widely used. Thus, we aimed to translate and validate the KIDSCREEN-27 scale for the usage among adolescents aged between 10 and 19 years old in Slovenia.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 2852 adolescents in primary and secondary school from November 2019 to January 2020 in Slovenia. 6-steps method of validation was used to test psychometric properties of the KIDSCREEN-27 scale. We checked descriptive statistics, performed a Mokken scale analysis, parametric item response theory, factor analysis, classical test theory and total (sub)scale scores.
resultsAll five subscales of the KIDSCREEN-27 formed a unidimensional scale with good homogeneity and reliability. The confirmatory factor analysis showed poor fit in user model versus baseline model metrics (CFI = 0.847; TLI = 0.862) and good fit in root mean square error (RMSEA = 0.072; p(χ
conclusionsThe questionnaire showed average psychometric properties and can be used among adolescents in Slovenia to find out about their quality of life. Further research is needed to explore why fit in user model metrics is poor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.