Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.
Sarthak PattanayakDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6750-4404
Satyananda JenaDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Priyanka DasDepartment of Agronomy, Palli Siksha Bhavana, Visva-Bharati, Sriniketan 731204, West Bengal, India.
Sagar MaitraDepartment of Agronomy, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi 761211, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8210-1531
Tanmoy ShankarDepartment of Agronomy, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi 761211, Odisha, India.
Subhashisa PraharajDepartment of Agronomy, Centurion University of Technology and Management, Paralakhemundi 761211, Odisha, India.
Prasannajit MishraDepartment of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Santanu MohantyDepartment of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Madhusmita PradhanDepartment of Soil Science and Agriculture Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, Odisha, India.
Deepak Kumar SwainDepartment of Agricultural Statistics, Institute of Agricultural Science, Siksha-o-Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751030, Odisha, India.
Biswajit PramanickDepartment of Agronomy, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur 848125, Bihar, India.ORCID 0000-0002-7116-8340
Ahmed GaberDepartment of Biology, College of Science, Taif University, P.O. Box 11099, Taif 21944, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-8297-935X
Akbar HossainDepartment of Agronomy, Bangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute, Dinajpur 5200, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-0264-2712
Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology · INCenturion University of Technology and Management · INBangladesh Wheat and Maize Research Institute · BDDr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agriculture University · INSiksha O Anusandhan University · INTaif University · SAVisva-Bharati University · IN
Funding
The study was funded by the Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Odisha University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India 751003. The current work was also partially funded by Taif University Researchers Supporting Project nu TURSP - 2020/39
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Weed management has become the most important and inevitable aspect of crop management for achieving a higher rice yield. Nowadays, chemical herbicide application has become a popular practice for managing weeds in different rice cultures. However, herbicide application can have qualitative and quantitative impacts on soil microorganisms and soil enzymes, particularly in the case of new herbicide molecules and their indiscriminate use for a longer period. Further, different rice establishment methods also play a significant role in soil microbial population dynamics as well as soil biological properties. Keeping these in view, a field experiment was conducted at the Agronomy Main Research Farm, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology (OUAT), India, during the
Indexed as
cultural methodsherbicidesimpactsricesoil enzymessoil microorganisms
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Weed Management and Crop Establishment Methods in Rice ( · full record | OpenQuestion