Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448780›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Novel Plant Breeding Techniques Shake Hands with Cereals to Increase Production.

Muhammad Haroon, Xiukang Wang, Rabail Afzal, Muhammad Mubashar Zafar, Fahad Idrees, Maria Batool, Abdul Saboor Khan, Muhammad Imran

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Establishment and comparative analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammad HaroonNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7159-9426
Xiukang WangCollege of Life Sciences, Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5638-809X
Rabail AfzalNational Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8582-3695
Muhammad Mubashar ZafarState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Key Laboratory of Biological and Genetic Breeding of Cotton, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Anyang 455000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5664-138X
Fahad IdreesCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Maria BatoolCollege of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China.
Abdul Saboor KhanInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Cologne, 50667 Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7924-7986
Muhammad ImranState Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Subtropical Agro-Bioresources, College of Agriculture, South China Agriculture University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7552-8326

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 2018JQ5218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cereals are the main source of human food on our planet. The ever-increasing food demand, continuously changing environment, and diseases of cereal crops have made adequate production a challenging task for feeding the ever-increasing population. Plant breeders are striving their hardest to increase production by manipulating conventional breeding methods based on the biology of plants, either self-pollinating or cross-pollinating. However, traditional approaches take a decade, space, and inputs in order to make crosses and release improved varieties. Recent advancements in genome editing tools (GETs) have increased the possibility of precise and rapid genome editing. New GETs such as CRISPR/Cas9, CRISPR/Cpf1, prime editing, base editing, dCas9 epigenetic modification, and several other transgene-free genome editing approaches are available to fill the lacuna of selection cycles and limited genetic diversity. Over the last few years, these technologies have led to revolutionary developments and researchers have quickly attained remarkable achievements. However, GETs are associated with various bottlenecks that prevent the scaling development of new varieties that can be dealt with by integrating the GETs with the improved conventional breeding methods such as speed breeding, which would take plant breeding to the next level. In this review, we have summarized all these traditional, molecular, and integrated approaches to speed up the breeding procedure of cereals.

Indexed as

base editingCRISPR Casepigeneticsgenome editingmolecular breedingplant breedingprime editingspeed breeding

Identifiers

PMID35448780
PMCPMC9025237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.