Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448725›Full record

ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022

Noise-Based Image Harmonization Significantly Increases Repeatability and Reproducibility of Radiomics Features in PET Images: A Phantom Study.

Harald Keller, Tina Shek, Brandon Driscoll, Yiwen Xu, Brian Nghiem, Sadek Nehmeh, Milan Grkovski, Charles Ross Schmidtlein, Mikalai Budzevich, Yoganand Balagurunathan and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Robust [Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT improves radiomics feature reliability.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review on radiomic analysis inCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Harald KellerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.
Tina ShekTechna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Brandon DriscollTechna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.
Yiwen XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.
Brian NghiemTechna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2463-9012
Sadek NehmehDepartment of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Milan GrkovskiDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Charles Ross SchmidtleinDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Mikalai BudzevichDepartment of Cancer Physiology, H.L. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Yoganand BalagurunathanDepartment of Cancer Physiology, H.L. Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
John J SunderlandDepartment of Radiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Reinhard R BeichelDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Carlos UribeFunctional Imaging, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada.
Ting-Yim LeeLawson Health Research Institute, London, ON N6A 4V2, Canada.
Fiona LiDepartment of Medical Biophysics, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 5C1, Canada.
David A JaffrayDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.
Ivan YeungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Jon C.D. Houtman · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Quantitative Imaging to Assess Response in Cancer Therapy TrialsU01CA140206 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BUATTI, JOHN M, CASAVANT, THOMAS L. · 2010 to 2019
$5.8M
CIHR OQI- 137992NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U01 CA140206NIH HHS U01CA140206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For multicenter clinical studies, characterizing the robustness of image-derived radiomics features is essential. Features calculated on PET images have been shown to be very sensitive to image noise. The purpose of this work was to investigate the efficacy of a relatively simple harmonization strategy on feature robustness and agreement. A purpose-built texture pattern phantom was scanned on 10 different PET scanners in 7 institutions with various different image acquisition and reconstruction protocols. An image harmonization technique based on equalizing a contrast-to-noise ratio was employed to generate a "harmonized" alongside a "standard" dataset for a reproducibility study. In addition, a repeatability study was performed with images from a single PET scanner of variable image noise, varying the binning time of the reconstruction. Feature agreement was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). In the repeatability study, 81/93 features had a lower ICC on the images with the highest image noise as compared to the images with the lowest image noise. Using the harmonized dataset significantly improved the feature agreement for five of the six investigated feature classes over the standard dataset. For three feature classes, high feature agreement corresponded with higher sensitivity to the different patterns, suggesting a way to select suitable features for predictive models.

Indexed as

Positron-Emission TomographyPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of Resultsfeature agreementimage harmonizationPET radiomics featuresrepeatabilityreproducibility

Identifiers

PMID35448725
PMCPMC9025788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.