ArticleTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)2022
Different Prognostic Values of Dual-Time-Point FDG PET/CT Imaging Features According to Treatment Modality in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Article in Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Clinical Impact of Dual Time PointCancers · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was aimed to investigate whether dual-time-point F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging features had different prognostic values according to the treatment modality in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively reviewed 121 NSCLC patients with surgical resection (surgery group) and 69 NSCLC patients with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (CRT group), who underwent pretreatment dual-time-point FDG PET/CT. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), SUV histogram entropy of primary cancer, and the percent changes in these parameters (Δparameters) were measured. In multivariate analysis, MTV, TLG, and entropy on both early and delayed PET/CT scans were significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) in the surgery group, but all Δparameters failed to show a significant association. In the CRT group, TLG on the early PET, maximum SUV on the delayed PET, ΔMTV, and ΔTLG were significant independent predictors for PFS. In the surgery group, patients with high values of MTV, TLG, and entropy had worse survival, whereas, in the CRT group, patients with high values of ΔMTV and ΔTLG had better survival. Dual-time-point FDG PET/CT parameters showed different prognostic values between the surgery and CRT groups of NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.