Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448698›Full record

ArticleMethods and protocols2022

Implementing a Rural Natural Experiment: A Protocol for Evaluating the Impacts of Food Coops on Food Consumption, Resident's Health and Community Vitality.

Éric Robitaille, Marie-Claude Paquette, Gabrielle Durette, Amélie Bergeron, Marianne Dubé, Mélanie Doyon, Geneviève Mercille, Marc Lemire, Ernest Lo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods and protocols, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Éric RobitailleInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.
Marie-Claude PaquetteInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1074-1051
Gabrielle DuretteInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.
Amélie BergeronInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.
Marianne DubéInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.
Mélanie DoyonDépartement de Géographie, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC H3C 3P8, Canada.
Geneviève MercilleCentre de Recherche en Santé Publique, Université de Montréal et CIUSSS du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, QC H3T 1A8, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5613-2350
Marc LemireInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.
Ernest LoInstitut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Montréal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.
Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec · CACentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal · CAUniversité du Québec à Montréal · CA

Funding

Ministry of Health and Social Services 1234
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal food environments are recognized by experts as a determinant of healthy eating. Food cooperatives (coop) can promote the accessibility to healthier foods and thus improve the health of the population, particularly in remote rural communities.

objectiveTo measure the effects of implementing a food coop in a disadvantaged community with poor access to food. We have two main research questions: (1). Does the establishment of a food coop in rural areas described as food deserts have an impact on accessibility, frequency of use, food consumption, food quality, and ultimately the health of individuals? (2). Does the establishment of a food coop in rural areas described as food deserts have an impact on food security and community vitality?

designA natural experiment with a mixed pre/post method will be used. The sample is composed of households that came from geographically isolated communities (population: 215 to 885 inhabitants) which qualified as food deserts and located in rural areas of Quebec (Canada). All communities plan to open a food coop (in the years 2022-2023), and as their opening will be staggered over time, participants from communities with a new food coop (intervention) will be compared to communities awaiting the opening of their food coop (control). Data collection was carried out at three time points: (1) before; (2) 1 to 5 months after; and (3) 13 to 17 months after the opening of the coop. Questionnaires were used to measure sociodemographic variables, dietary intake, residents' health, and community vitality. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with community stakeholders.

resultsFew natural experiments have been conducted regarding the impact of implementing food coops. Gathering concrete data on the effectiveness and processes surrounding these interventions through natural experiments will help to quantify their impact and guide knowledge users and policymakers to make more informed decisions.

Indexed as

accessibilityfood environmentinterventionsisolatednutrition

Identifiers

PMID35448698
PMCPMC9025453
OpenAlexW4224255215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.