Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448668›Full record

ReviewVeterinary sciences2022

Welfare Assessment Tools in Zoos: From Theory to Practice.

Narelle Jones, Sally L Sherwen, Rachel Robbins, David J McLelland, Alexandra L Whittaker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Veterinary sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Ethogram ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PsittaWel: A welfare assessment tool for companion parrots.Animal welfare (South Mimms, England) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The impact of parasitic diseases on dromedary camel (Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Narelle JonesSchool of Animal & Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5371, Australia.
Sally L SherwenWildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia.
Rachel RobbinsZoos South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
David J McLellandSchool of Animal & Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4125-9126
Alexandra L WhittakerSchool of Animal & Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5371, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-8296

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zoos are increasingly implementing formalized animal welfare assessment programs to allow monitoring of welfare over time, as well as to aid in resource prioritization. These programs tend to rely on assessment tools that incorporate resource-based and observational animal-focused measures. A narrative review of the literature was conducted to bring together recent studies examining welfare assessment methods in zoo animals. A summary of these methods is provided, with advantages and limitations of the approaches presented. We then highlight practical considerations with respect to implementation of these tools into practice, for example scoring schemes, weighting of criteria, and innate animal factors for consideration. It is concluded that there would be value in standardizing guidelines for development of welfare assessment tools since zoo accreditation bodies rarely prescribe these. There is also a need to develop taxon or species-specific assessment tools to complement more generic processes and more directly inform welfare management.

Indexed as

animal-basedfive domainsresource-basedscoringvalidityzoo animal welfare

Identifiers

PMID35448668
PMCPMC9025157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.