ArticleMetabolites2022
Plasma Metabolic and Lipidomic Fingerprinting of Individuals with Increased Intestinal Permeability.
Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cardiac remodeling after bariatric surgery associates with systemic metabolic reprogramming: a longitudinal untargeted metabolomics study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Article
- Identifying Putative Biomarkers of Foodborne Pathogens Using a Metabolomic Approach.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Lipidomic Approaches in Common and Rare Cerebrovascular Diseases: The Discovery of Unconventional Lipids as Novel Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Chewing the fat: How lipidomics is changing our understanding of human health and disease in 2022.Analytical science advances · 2023Review
- Multi-Omics, an Integrated Approach to Identify Novel Blood Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease.Metabolites · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The dual-sugar intestinal permeability test is a commonly used test to assess changes in gut barrier function. However, it does not identify functional changes and the exact mechanism of damage caused by the increased intestinal permeability. This study aims to explore the application of untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics to identify markers of increased intestinal permeability. Fifty fasting male participants (18-50 years) attended a single visit to conduct the following procedures: assessment of anthropometric measures, assessment of gastrointestinal symptoms, intestinal permeability test, and assessment of blood samples 90 min post-administration of the intestinal permeability test. Rhamnose and lactulose were analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Untargeted polar metabolites and lipidomics were assessed by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QToF MS). There was an elevated lactulose/rhamnose ratio in 27 subjects, indicating increased permeability compared to the remaining 23 control subjects. There were no significant differences between groups in characteristics such as age, body mass index (BMI), weight, height, and waist conference. Fourteen metabolites from the targeted metabolomics data were identified as statistically significant in the plasma samples from intestinal permeability subjects. The untargeted metabolomics and lipidomics analyses yielded fifteen and fifty-one statistically significant features, respectively. Individuals with slightly elevated intestinal permeability had altered energy, nucleotide, and amino acid metabolism, in addition to increased glutamine levels. Whether these biomarkers may be used to predict the early onset of leaky gut warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.